Cited by 132EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningFrench Language Learning Methods

The Role of Negative and Positive Feedback in the Second Language Acquisition of the Passé Composé and Imparfait

Ayoun, Dalila·2001·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

This study tests the effectiveness of written recasts versus models in the acquisition of the aspectual distinction between two past tenses in French, the passé composé and the imparfait with a pretest, repeated exposure, and posttest design. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: R (recasting: implicit negative feedback), (modeling: pre‐emptive positive evidence), and G (grammar: explicit positive evidence and negative feedback). The M and R groups read a different story with illustrations each week: (a) In the M condition, participants were shown a sentence corresponding to the illustration for 3 seconds, then were asked to answer a related question; (b) in the R condition, participants formed a sentence with given elements based on the illustration, then were exposed to the correct answer for 3 seconds; (c) the G group read traditional grammar lessons, took a short practice, and were presented with the answer key. Posttest results reveal that the R group performed significantly better than the G group but not the M group, partially supporting the hypothesis that recasting is the most effective form of feedback.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0026-7902.00106

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learners' attention is drawn to certain features more than others when there is no external manipulation, regardless of the target language.

    “This difficulty is evident from a body of research revealing that learners' attention is drawn to certain features more than others when there is no external manipulation, regardless of the target language (e.g.English : Mackey 2006;French: Ayoun 2001;Japanese: Loschky 1994).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Ayoun 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ayoun, D.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Ayoun, Dalila
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
226-243
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W1999094145
Cited by
132
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › French Language Learning Methods
Keywords
second language acquisition, negative feedback, positive feedback, modeling, French as a second language, passé composé, imparfait, aspectual distinctions, past tense, explicit grammar instruction, implicit feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review