The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Does Fear Override Hope in Societies Engulfed by Intractable Conflict, as It Does in the Israeli Society?
Abstract
The question of why fear overrides hope in societies embarked on the road of peacemaking after years of intractable conflict is answered on the basis of accumulated knowledge in the psychology and sociology of emotions. This knowledge suggests that fear is an automatic emotion, grounded in the perceived present and often based on the memorized past (also processed unconsciously), that leads to freezing of beliefs, conservatism, and sometimes preemptive aggression. Hope, in contrast, involves mostly cognitive activity, which requires the search for new ideas and thus is based on creativity and flexibility. Because hope is based on thinking, it can be seriously impeded by the spontaneous and unconscious interference of fear. Both fear and hope can become collective emotional orientations that organize society’s views and direct its forms of action. It is assumed that societies involved in intractable conflict are dominated by a collective emotional orientation of fear, which is functional in their coping with the stressful and demanding situation. But such an orientation serves as a psychological obstacle to a peace process once it starts. The Israeli Jewish case of collective fear orientation is offered as an example. The presentation includes the roots of this orientation, the ways in which it is reflected and disseminated, and its expressions among the Israeli Jewish public; it ends optimistically with the suggestion that societies can determine to overcome their fear and establish a collective orientation of hope for peace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
Cultural variations in emotions: A review.
Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.179 · Cited by 1,084
Cited by
Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one's group has done wrong or been wronged
Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280600574815 · Cited by 339
The dominance of fear over hope in the life of individuals and collectives
Jarymowicz, M., & Bar‐Tal, D. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.302 · Cited by 279
Self-citationSocio-psychological barriers to peace making: The case of the Israeli Jewish Society
Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E., & Oren, N. (2010) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01018.x · Cited by 105
Self-citationNasie, M., Bar-Tal, D., Pliskin, R., Nahhas, E., & Halperin, E. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167214551153 · Cited by 56
Self-citationCohen-Chen, S., van Kleef, G. A., Crisp, R. J., & Halperin, E. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.04.002 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Bar‐Tal, D.
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 601-627
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W1985065714
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Does Fear Override Hope in Societies Engulfed by Intractable Conflict, as It Does in the Israeli Society? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0162-895x.00255
- The paper
- Bar‐Tal, D. (2001). Why Does Fear Override Hope in Societies Engulfed by Intractable Conflict, as It Does in the Israeli Society? Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.