Cited by 69Dermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesSkin Protection and Aging

Sensitive skin evaluation in the J apanese population

KAMIDE, Ryoichi, MISERY, Laurent, PEREZ‐CULLELL, Nuria, SIBAUD, Vincent, TAÏEB, Charles·2013·The Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Sensitive skin syndrome was first described in 1977; however, no robust study has been carried out to evaluate its prevalence in Japan. A national representative sample of the Japanese population over the age of 18 years was taken. Individuals were questioned by telephone and selected according to the quota method. When asked "Do you have a sensitive skin?", 52.84% of men and 55.98% of women answered "rather sensitive" or "very sensitive". There was no significant difference (P = 0.22) between the two sexes. The non-response rate among respondents was zero, suggesting that the term "sensitive skin" held a meaning for the majority of the population. Concerning questions about the onset of a rash, tingling or irritation in the presence of various factors, such as emotional issues, cold, heat, sun, dry air, air-conditioning, water, air pollution and temperature variations, respondents with rather sensitive or very sensitive skin responded "yes" more often than others: approximately three-times more often for water (18.97%/6.15%), air pollution (39.29%/12.45%) and warm climatic conditions (29.74%/9.8%). To our knowledge, this epidemiological study is the first to focus on sensitive skin among Japanese people of this century. It is of particular interest for two reasons: (i) it was conducted on a representative sample of the Japanese population; and (ii) the methodology used was identical to that used for sensitive skin assessment studies conducted in Europe and the USA, making it possible to draw certain comparisons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1346-8138.12027

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
KAMIDE, R., MISERY, L., PEREZ‐CULLELL, N., SIBAUD, V., & TAÏEB, C.
Affiliations
  • Jikei University School of Medicine (JP)
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (FR)
  • Department of Dermatology Eau Thermale Avène Lavaur France
  • Institut Claudius Regaud (FR)
  • Public Health and Quality of Life PFSA Boulogne‐Billancourt France
Venue
The Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-17
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
177-181
ISSN
  • 0385-2407 (ISSN-L)
  • 1346-8138
OpenAlex
W2060825924
Cited by
69
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
sensitive skin, prevalence, Japanese population, skin irritation, air pollution, water exposure, warm climate, sex differences, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Climate, Cosmetics, Dermatology, Female, Food, Humans, Japan, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Skin, Skin Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review