The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urban drivers of plant‐pollinator interactions
Abstract
Summary: Plant–pollinator interactions are affected by global change, with largely negative impacts on pollination and plant reproduction. Urban areas provide a unique and productive study system for understanding the impacts of many global change drivers on plant–pollinator interactions. We review the mechanistic pathways through which urban drivers alter plant–pollinator interactions. The literature on urban drivers of plant–pollinator interactions is small but growing and has already produced exciting insights about how population processes or pollinator behaviour interacts with landscape urban drivers to affect pollination outcomes. Habitat loss and fragmentation can change flower visitation rates and pollination success through changes in pollinator foraging behaviour or through population‐level effects on pollinators. Urban environments, where impermeable surface provides an inhospitable matrix, may allow researchers to identify habitat fragments more clearly than in many other environments. Recent studies have found that non‐native plants are not differently preferred by pollinators relative to native plants, therefore removing the basis for expecting pollinator‐mediated competition between native and non‐native plants in urban habitats. However, non‐native species together with managed vegetation may have powerful effects in urban habitats via changes in community‐level plant phenology and consequent changes in pollinator phenology. The current level of climate warming has not caused plants and pollinators to become detectably temporally separated, although at the same time, diversity among species’ phenological responses could buffer plant–pollinator interactions from climate variation. Due to the urban warming effect, cities provide a promising system for better understanding the warming effects on plant–pollinator interactions. Environmental contaminants such as soil nitrogen and heavy metal pollution have been examined with respect to plant–pollinator interactions in small‐scale, mechanistic studies. The extent to which environmental contaminants drive plant–pollinator interactions in actual urban landscapes is, however, currently unknown. Important knowledge gaps that require research attention include understanding the consequences of plant and pollinator trait filtering on plant–pollinator interactions, and expanding the literature to include underrepresented biomes and pollinator taxa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · Cited by 6,458
Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools
Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109 · Cited by 5,086
Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size
Greenleaf, S. S., Williams, N. M., Winfree, R., & Kremen, C. (2007) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9 · Cited by 1,785
Self-citationTolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions
Memmott, J., Waser, N. M., & Price, M. V. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2909 · Cited by 1,238
Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Boone, C. G., Groffman, P. M., Irwin, E., Kaushal, S. S., Marshall, V., McGrath, B. P., Nilon, C. H., et al. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022 · Cited by 1,126
Aguilar, R., Ashworth, L., Galetto, L., & Aizen, M. A. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x · Cited by 1,079
Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity
Hope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W., Fagan, W. F., Redman, C. L., Grimm, N. B., Nelson, A. L., Martin, C., & Kinzig, A. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1537557100 · Cited by 880
Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators
Fürst, M. A., McMahon, D. P., Osborne, J. L., Paxton, R. J., & Brown, M. J. F. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12977 · Cited by 691
Native Pollinators in Anthropogenic Habitats
Winfree, R., Bartomeus, I., & Cariveau, D. P. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145042 · Cited by 620
Self-citationShifts in flowering phenology reshape a subalpine plant community
CaraDonna, P. J., Iler, A. M., & Inouye, D. W. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323073111 · Cited by 593
Cited by
The city as a refuge for insect pollinators
Hall, D. M., Camilo, G. R., Tonietto, R. K., Ollerton, J., Ahrné, K., Arduser, M., Ascher, J. S., Baldock, K. C. R., Fowler, R., Frankie, G., et al. (2017) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12840 · Cited by 657
How urbanization is driving pollinator diversity and pollination – A systematic review
Wenzel, A., Grass, I., Belavadi, V. V., & Tscharntke, T. (2020) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108321 · Cited by 485
Ecological connectivity research in urban areas
LaPoint, S., Balkenhol, N., Hale, J., Sadler, J., & van der Ree, R. (2015) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12489 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, T., & Winfree, R.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06-19
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 879-888
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W1945257410
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urban drivers of plant‐pollinator interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2435.12486
- The paper
- Harrison, T., & Winfree, R. (2015). Urban drivers of plant‐pollinator interactions. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.