The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecological connectivity research in urban areas
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The successful movement of individuals is fundamental to life. Facilitating these movements by promoting ecological connectivity has become a central theme in ecology and conservation. Urban areas contain more than half of the world's human population, and their potential to support biodiversity and to connect their citizens to nature is increasingly recognized. Promoting ecological connectivity within these areas is essential to reaching this potential. However, our current understanding of ecological connectivity within urban areas appears limited. We reviewed the published scientific literature to assess the state‐of‐the‐art of ecological connectivity research in urban areas, summarized trends in study attributes and highlighted knowledge gaps. We found 174 papers that investigated ecological connectivity within urban areas. These papers addressed either structural (48) or functional connectivity (111), and some addressed both (15), but contained substantial geographic and taxonomic biases. These papers rarely defined the aspect of connectivity they were investigating and objective descriptions of the local urban context were uncommon. Formulated hypotheses or a priori predictions were typically unstated and many papers used suboptimal study designs and methods. We suggest future studies explicitly consider and quantify the landscape within their analyses and make greater use of available and rapidly developing tools and methods for measuring functional connectivity (e.g. biotelemetry or landscape genetics). We also highlight the need for studies to clearly define how the terms ‘urban’ and ‘connectivity’ have been applied. Knowledge gaps in ecological connectivity in urban areas remain, partly because the field is still in its infancy and partly because we must better capitalize on the state‐of‐the‐art technological and analytical techniques that are increasingly available. Well‐designed studies that employed high‐resolution data and powerful analytical techniques highlight our abilities to quantify ecological connectivity in urban areas. These studies are exemplary, setting the standards for future research to facilitate data‐driven and evidence‐based biodiversity‐friendly infrastructure planning in urban areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
Global Change and the Ecology of Cities
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150195 · Cited by 7,139
Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization
McKinney, M. L. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005 · Cited by 3,841
A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research
Nathan, R., Getz, W. M., Revilla, E., Holyoak, M., Kadmon, R., Saltz, D., & Smouse, P. E. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800375105 · Cited by 2,968
Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure
Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., & Merriam, G. (1993) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544927 · Cited by 2,568
USING CIRCUIT THEORY TO MODEL CONNECTIVITY IN ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CONSERVATION
McRae, B. H., Dickson, B. G., Keitt, T. H., & Shah, V. B. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1861.1 · Cited by 2,244
PINAUD, D., & WEIMERSKIRCH, H. (2007) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01186.x · Cited by 1,991
Bayesian Inference of Recent Migration Rates Using Multilocus Genotypes
Wilson, G. A., & Rannala, B. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/163.3.1177 · Cited by 1,979
Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics
Manel, S., Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G., & Taberlet, P. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00008-9 · Cited by 1,859
Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet
Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W., & Wikelski, M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2478 · Cited by 1,638
Cited by
The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments
Schell, C. J., Dyson, K., Fuentes, T. L., Des Roches, S., Harris, N. C., Miller, D. S., Woelfle-Erskine, C. A., & Lambert, M. R. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay4497 · Cited by 665
Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges
Babí Almenar, J., Elliot, T., Rugani, B., Philippe, B., Navarrete Gutierrez, T., Sonnemann, G., & Geneletti, D. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898 · Cited by 378
Urban drivers of plant‐pollinator interactions
Harrison, T., & Winfree, R. (2015) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12486 · Cited by 335
Zhang, Z., Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Lindquist, M. (2019) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.014 · Cited by 294
A bird’s eye view: using circuit theory to study urban landscape connectivity for birds
Grafius, D. R., Corstanje, R., Siriwardena, G. M., Plummer, K. E., & Harris, J. A. (2017) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0548-1 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- LaPoint, S., Balkenhol, N., Hale, J., Sadler, J., & van der Ree, R.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 868-878
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W1957837276
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological connectivity research in urban areas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2435.12489
- The paper
- LaPoint, S., Balkenhol, N., Hale, J., Sadler, J., & van der Ree, R. (2015). Ecological connectivity research in urban areas. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12489
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.