The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models
Abstract
Summary: Many publications documenting large‐scale trends in the distribution of species make use of opportunistic citizen data, that is, observations of species collected without standardized field protocol and without explicit sampling design. It is a challenge to achieve reliable estimates of distribution trends from them, because opportunistic citizen science data may suffer from changes in field efforts over time (observation bias), from incomplete and selective recording by observers (reporting bias) and from geographical bias. These, in addition to detection bias, may lead to spurious trends. We investigated whether occupancy models can correct for the observation, reporting and detection biases in opportunistic data. Occupancy models use detection/nondetection data and yield estimates of the percentage of occupied sites (occupancy) per year. These models take the imperfect detection of species into account. By correcting for detection bias, they may simultaneously correct for observation and reporting bias as well. We compared trends in occupancy (or distribution) of butterfly and dragonfly species derived from opportunistic data with those derived from standardized monitoring data. All data came from the same grid squares and years, in order to avoid any geographical bias in this comparison. Distribution trends in opportunistic and monitoring data were well‐matched. Strong trends observed in monitoring data were rarely missed in opportunistic data. Synthesis and applications. Opportunistic data can be used for monitoring purposes if occupancy models are used for analysis. Occupancy models are able to control for the common biases encountered with opportunistic data, enabling species trends to be monitored for species groups and regions where it is not feasible to collect standardized data on a large scale. Opportunistic data may thus become an important source of information to track distribution trends in many groups of species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kuussaari, M., Heliölä, J., Pöyry, J., & Saarinen, K. (2007) · Journal of Insect Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10841-006-9052-7 · Cited by 131
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.035 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1009678422145 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1009690919835 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00982.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00150.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01732.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01732.x
- Kéry M., 2010, Introduction to WinBUGS for Ecologists – A Bayesian Approach to Regression, ANOVA, Mixed Models and Related Analyses
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01479.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.009 · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.009
- MacKenzie D.I., 2006, Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.021 · DOI
- Pollard E., 1993, Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation
- 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00639.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01734.x · DOI · Paper page
- Royle J.A., 2008, Hierarchical Modeling and Inference in Ecology
- 10.1890/06-0669.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Spiegelhalter D., 2003, WinBUGS User Manual, Version 1.4
- 10.1890/09-0877.1 · DOI
- 10.1890/10-1786.1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00442-008-0959-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.baae.2010.05.003 · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2010.05.003
- Swaay C.A.M., 2002, Monitoring butterflies in the Netherlands: how to get unbiased indices, Proceedings of the Experimental & Applied Entomology, NEV Amsterdam, 13, 21
- Swaay C.A.M., 2011, Handleiding Landelijke Meetnetten Vlinders en Libellen (Manual Monitoring Schemes Butterflies and Dragonflies)
- Swaay C.A.M., 1999, Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera)
- Turnhout C.A.M., 2008, Monitoring common and scarce breeding birds in the Netherlands: applying a posthoc stratification and weighting procedure to obtain less biased population trends, Journal of Catalan Ornithology, 24, 15
Cited by
Defaunation in the Anthropocene
Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J. B., & Collen, B. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251817 · Cited by 4,474
Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
Woodcock, B. A., Isaac, N. J. B., Bullock, J. M., Roy, D. B., Garthwaite, D. G., Crowe, A., & Pywell, R. F. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12459 · Cited by 550
Guillera‐Arroita, G. (2017) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.02445 · Cited by 426
(2021) · doi:10.1111/ddi.13271 · Cited by 407
The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool
Burgess, H. K., DeBey, L. B., Froehlich, H. E., Schmidt, N., Theobald, E. J., Ettinger, A. K., HilleRisLambers, J., Tewksbury, J., & Parrish, J. K. (2017) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- van Strien, A. J., van Swaay, C. A. M., & Termaat, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1450-1458
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1984347929
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2664.12158
- The paper
- van Strien, A. J., van Swaay, C. A. M., & Termaat, T. (2013). Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.