Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models

van Strien, Arco J., van Swaay, Chris A.M., Termaat, Tim·2013·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Many publications documenting large‐scale trends in the distribution of species make use of opportunistic citizen data, that is, observations of species collected without standardized field protocol and without explicit sampling design. It is a challenge to achieve reliable estimates of distribution trends from them, because opportunistic citizen science data may suffer from changes in field efforts over time (observation bias), from incomplete and selective recording by observers (reporting bias) and from geographical bias. These, in addition to detection bias, may lead to spurious trends. We investigated whether occupancy models can correct for the observation, reporting and detection biases in opportunistic data. Occupancy models use detection/nondetection data and yield estimates of the percentage of occupied sites (occupancy) per year. These models take the imperfect detection of species into account. By correcting for detection bias, they may simultaneously correct for observation and reporting bias as well. We compared trends in occupancy (or distribution) of butterfly and dragonfly species derived from opportunistic data with those derived from standardized monitoring data. All data came from the same grid squares and years, in order to avoid any geographical bias in this comparison. Distribution trends in opportunistic and monitoring data were well‐matched. Strong trends observed in monitoring data were rarely missed in opportunistic data. Synthesis and applications. Opportunistic data can be used for monitoring purposes if occupancy models are used for analysis. Occupancy models are able to control for the common biases encountered with opportunistic data, enabling species trends to be monitored for species groups and regions where it is not feasible to collect standardized data on a large scale. Opportunistic data may thus become an important source of information to track distribution trends in many groups of species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2664.12158

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.035 · DOI
  2. 10.1023/A:1009678422145 · DOI
  3. 10.1023/A:1009690919835 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00982.x · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00150.x · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01732.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01732.x
  7. Kéry M., 2010, Introduction to WinBUGS for Ecologists – A Bayesian Approach to Regression, ANOVA, Mixed Models and Related Analyses
  8. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01479.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.009 · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.009
  10. MacKenzie D.I., 2006, Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence
  11. 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.021 · DOI
  12. Pollard E., 1993, Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation
  13. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00639.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01734.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Royle J.A., 2008, Hierarchical Modeling and Inference in Ecology
  16. 10.1890/06-0669.1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Spiegelhalter D., 2003, WinBUGS User Manual, Version 1.4
  21. 10.1890/09-0877.1 · DOI
  22. 10.1890/10-1786.1 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s00442-008-0959-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.baae.2010.05.003 · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2010.05.003
  25. Swaay C.A.M., 2002, Monitoring butterflies in the Netherlands: how to get unbiased indices, Proceedings of the Experimental & Applied Entomology, NEV Amsterdam, 13, 21
  26. Swaay C.A.M., 2011, Handleiding Landelijke Meetnetten Vlinders en Libellen (Manual Monitoring Schemes Butterflies and Dragonflies)
  27. Swaay C.A.M., 1999, Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera)
  28. Turnhout C.A.M., 2008, Monitoring common and scarce breeding birds in the Netherlands: applying a posthoc stratification and weighting procedure to obtain less biased population trends, Journal of Catalan Ornithology, 24, 15

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
van Strien, A. J., van Swaay, C. A. M., & Termaat, T.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-10
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
1450-1458
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W1984347929
Cited by
424
References
1
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2664.12158
The paper
van Strien, A. J., van Swaay, C. A. M., & Termaat, T. (2013). Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12158

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.