The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Cities are rapidly expanding world‐wide and there is an increasing urgency to protect urban biodiversity, principally through the provision of suitable habitat, most of which is in urban green spaces. Despite this, clear guidelines of how to reverse biodiversity loss or increase it within a given urban green space is lacking. We examined the taxa‐ and species‐specific responses of five taxonomically and functionally diverse animal groups to three key attributes of urban green space vegetation that drive habitat quality and can be manipulated over time: the density of large native trees, volume of understorey vegetation and percentage of native vegetation. Using multi‐species occupancy‐detection models, we found marked differences in the effect of these vegetation attributes on bats, birds, bees, beetles and bugs. At the taxa‐level, increasing the volume of understorey vegetation and percentage of native vegetation had uniformly positive effects. We found 30–120% higher occupancy for bats, native birds, beetles and bugs with an increase in understorey volume from 10% to 30%, and 10–140% higher occupancy across all native taxa with an increase in the proportion of native vegetation from 10% to 30%. However, increasing the density of large native trees had a mostly neutral effect. At the species‐specific level, the majority of native species responded strongly and positively to increasing understorey volume and native vegetation, whereas exotic bird species had a neutral response. Synthesis and applications. We found the probability of occupancy of most species examined was substantially reduced in urban green spaces with sparse understorey vegetation and few native plants. Our findings provide evidence that increasing understorey cover and native plantings in urban green spaces can improve biodiversity outcomes. Redressing the dominance of simplified and exotic vegetation present in urban landscapes with an increase in understorey vegetation volume and percentage of native vegetation will benefit a broad array of biodiversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Change and the Ecology of Cities
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150195 · Cited by 7,139
Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools
Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109 · Cited by 5,086
Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001 · Cited by 2,810
Aronson, M. F. J., La Sorte, F. A., Nilon, C. H., Katti, M., Goddard, M. A., Lepczyk, C. A., Warren, P. S., Williams, N. S. G., Cilliers, S., Clarkson, B., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3330 · Cited by 1,770
Self-citationUrban effects on native avifauna: a review
Chace, J. F., & Walsh, J. J. (2006) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007 · Cited by 1,698
Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments.
Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J., & Benton, T. G. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016 · Cited by 1,595
Beninde, J., Veith, M., & Hochkirch, A. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12427 · Cited by 1,249
Royle, J. A., & Dorazio, R. M. (2008) · Cited by 1,155
Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages
EVANS, K. L., NEWSON, S. E., & GASTON, K. J. (2009) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2008.00898.x · Cited by 427
Impacts of forest fragmentation on species richness: a hierarchical approach to community modelling
Zipkin, E. F., DeWan, A., & Andrew Royle, J. (2009) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01664.x · Cited by 341
Cited by
The role of ‘nativeness’ in urban greening to support animal biodiversity
Berthon, K., Thomas, F., & Bekessy, S. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103959 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Threlfall, C. G., Mata, L., Mackie, J. A., Hahs, A. K., Stork, N. E., Williams, N. S. G., & Livesley, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-23
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1874-1883
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2581177395
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 16.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2664.12876
- The paper
- Threlfall, C. G., Mata, L., Mackie, J. A., Hahs, A. K., Stork, N. E., Williams, N. S. G., & Livesley, S. J. (2017). Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.