The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical transitions in disturbance‐driven ecosystems: identifying Windows of Opportunity for recovery
Abstract
Summary: Vegetation recovery in disturbance‐driven ecosystems is difficult to predict. We demonstrate a concept to analyse time series for short‐term variability in external forcing that can identify potential events for sudden vegetation recovery in biogeomorphic ecosystems such as saltmarshes, mangroves, dunes or floodplains. Time series of external forcing (i.e. water level and wind speed) were analysed for ‘Windows of Opportunity’ (WoO), defined as disturbance‐free periods of a critical minimal duration directly following potential diaspore dispersal, which allow seedling establishment and can induce a sudden shift to a new persistent vegetation cover. Across different ecosystems, the minimal required WoO duration determines how many WoO events are available for seedling establishment. The distribution of WoO along an elevation gradient on riverbanks and in tidal systems, for example, is defined by the combination of the overall disturbance regime (e.g. seasonal vs. tidal flooding cycles) and the stochastic deviations from that regime (e.g. changes in weather conditions). Standardizing the WoO for the frequency of the regular disturbance regime shows that tidal and river systems have a similar relation between the required WoO length and the elevation suitable for establishment. WoO analysis correctly predicted a sudden vegetation recovery event in a saltmarsh case study. Synthesis. Time‐series analysis for ‘WoO’ offers an important tool towards predicting the establishment of vegetation cover in disturbance‐driven ecosystems and may have broader implications for understanding critical transitions in general. Quantifying the effects of stochastic external forcing on critical transitions in ecosystems is crucial for restoration efforts and to assess the effects of anthropogenic and global change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35098000 · Cited by 7,510
Anticipating Critical Transitions
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Lenton, T. M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W., Dakos, V., van de Koppel, J., van de Leemput, I. A., Levin, S. A., van Nes, E. H., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225244 · Cited by 2,208
Mangrove forests: Resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change
Alongi, D. M. (2008) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024 · Cited by 1,913
Alley, R. B., Marotzke, J., Nordhaus, W. D., Overpeck, J. T., Peteet, D. M., Pielke, R. A., Pierrehumbert, R. T., Rhines, P. B., Stocker, T. F., Talley, L. D., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1081056 · Cited by 1,331
Early Warnings of Regime Shifts: A Whole-Ecosystem Experiment
Carpenter, S. R., Cole, J. J., Pace, M. L., Batt, R., Brock, W. A., Cline, T., Coloso, J., Hodgson, J. R., Kitchell, J. F., Seekell, D. A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1203672 · Cited by 896
Ecological engineering for successful management and restoration of mangrove forests
Lewis, R. R. R. (2005) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.10.003 · Cited by 827
Tolerance of riverine plants to flooding and exposure indicated by water regime
Blanch, S. J., Ganf, G. G., & Walker, K. F. (1999) · Regulated Rivers: Research & Management · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1646(199901/06)15:1/3<43::aid-rrr535>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 825
Corenblit, D., Tabacchi, E., Steiger, J., & Gurnell, A. M. (2007) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 721
Streamflow requirements for cottonwood seedling recruitment—An integrative model
Mahoney, J. M., & Rood, S. B. (1998) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/bf03161678 · Cited by 708
The role of hydrochory in structuring riparian and wetland vegetation
Nilsson, C., Brown, R. L., Jansson, R., & Merritt, D. M. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00129.x · Cited by 530
Cited by
Embryo dune development drivers: beach morphology, growing season precipitation, and storms
van Puijenbroek, M. E. B., Limpens, J., de Groot, A. V., Riksen, M. J. P. M., Gleichman, M., Slim, P. A., van Dobben, H. F., & Berendse, F. (2017) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.4144 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Balke, T., Herman, P. M. J., & Bouma, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-17
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 700-708
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2117082147
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical transitions in disturbance‐driven ecosystems: identifying Windows of Opportunity for recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2745.12241
- The paper
- Balke, T., Herman, P. M. J., & Bouma, T. J. (2014). Critical transitions in disturbance‐driven ecosystems: identifying Windows of Opportunity for recovery. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.