Cited by 56Stuttering Research and TreatmentLanguage Development and DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Preliminary study of disfluency in school‐aged children with autism

Open access
Scaler Scott, Kathleen, Tetnowski, John A., Flaitz, James R., Yaruss, J. Scott·2014·International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been increased identification of disfluencies in individuals with autism, but limited examination of disfluencies in the school‐age range of this population. We currently lack information about whether the disfluencies of children with autism represent concomitant stuttering, normal disfluency, excessive normal disfluency, or some form of disfluency unique to the school‐age population of children with autism. Aims: This paper explores the nature of disfluencies in school‐aged children with autism in comparison with matched children who stutter and controls. It explores stuttering‐like disfluencies, non‐stuttering‐like disfluencies and word‐final disfluencies. Methods & Procedures: This study compared disfluency patterns in 11 school‐aged children with Asperger's syndrome (AS), 11 matched children who stutter (CWS), and 11 matched children with no diagnosis (ND). Analyses were based on speech samples collected during an expository discourse task. Outcomes & Results: Results reveal statistically significant differences between children with AS and CWS and between children with AS and those with ND for the percentage of words containing stuttering‐like disfluencies. In the AS group, four out of 11 (36%) met the common diagnostic criteria for a fluency disorder. Disfluencies in the AS group differed qualitatively and quantitatively from the CWS, and included a larger distribution of word‐final disfluencies. Conclusions & Implications: This study provides initial data regarding patterns of disfluency in school‐aged children with AS that, with careful consideration and the cautious application of all findings, can assist therapists in making more evidence‐based diagnostic decisions. Findings offer evidence that when working with children with AS, disfluencies both similar and dissimilar to those of CWS may be identified in at least a subset of those with AS. Therefore, children with AS should be screened for fluency disorders during their initial evaluation and treated if it is determined that the fluency disorder negatively impacts the effectiveness of communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1460-6984.12048

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children and adults with ASD produce unusually high rates of various speech disfluencies.

    “A significant body of research suggests that children and adults with ASD produce unusually high rates of various speech disfluencies [16, 35, 42, 50, 51, 54], but only three studies have specifically examined UM and UH.”

    From Linguistic camouflage in girls with autism spectrum disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. DEWEY, J., 2005, My experiences with cluttering. Paper pre- sented at the International Stuttering Awareness Day On-Line Conference (available at: http://www.mnsu.edu/ comdis/isad8/papers/dewey8.html0 (accessed on 20 June 2011).
  2. FOSNOT, S. M. and JUN, S., 1999, Prosodic characteristics in chil- dren with stuttering or autism during reading and imitation. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 1925-1928.
  3. HALL, P. K., 1977, The occurrence of disfluencies of language dis- ordered school-aged children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 364-369.
  4. MCALLISTER, J. and KINGSTON, M., 2005, Final part-word repe- titions on school-aged children: two case studies. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30, 255-267.
  5. RILEY, G. D., 1994, Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults, Third Edition (Austin, TX: PRO-ED).
  6. ROSENFIELD, D. B., VISWANATH, N. S., CALLIS-LANDRUM, L., DI- DANATO, R. and NUDELMAN, H. B., 1991, Patients with ac- quired dysfluencies: what they tell us about developmental stuttering. In H. F. M. Peters, W. Hulstijn and C. W. Stark- weather (eds), Speech Motor Control and Stuttering (Amster- dam: Elsevier) pp. 277-284.
  7. SCALER SCOTT, K. and ST. LOUIS, K. O., 2011, Consumer issues: Self-help for people with cluttering. In D. Ward and K. Scaler Scott (eds), Cluttering: Research, Intervention and Education (Hove: Psychology Press) pp. 211-229.
  8. SCALER SCOTT, K., WARD, D. and ST. LOUIS, K. O., 2010, Clut- tering in a school-aged child. In S. Chabon and E. Cohn (eds), Communication Disorders: A Case-Based Approach: Sto- ries From The Front Line (Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon) pp. 261-272.
  9. SCOTT, K. S., GROSSMAN, H. L., ABENDROTH, K. J., TETNOWSKI, J. A. and DAMICO, J. S., 2006, Asperger syndrome and attention deficit disorder: clinical disfluency analysis. In J. Au-Yeung and M. M. Leahy (eds), Research, Treatment, and Self-Help in Fluency Disorders: New Horizons. Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Fluency Disorders (Dublin: International Fluency Association) pp. 273-278.
  10. WATKINS, R. V., YAIRI, E. and AMBROSE, N. G. 1999. Early child- hood stuttering III: Initial status of expressive language abil- ities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1125-1135.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scaler Scott, K., Tetnowski, J. A., Flaitz, J. R., & Yaruss, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Misericordia University Department of Speech–Language Pathology Dallas PA USA
  • University of Louisiana at Lafayette (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-11
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
75-89
ISSN
  • 1368-2822 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-6984
OpenAlex
W1949831792
Cited by
56
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, stuttering, disfluency, school-aged children, stuttering-like disfluencies, speech screening, expository discourse
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Speech, Speech Production Measurement, Speech Therapy, Stuttering, Verbal Behavior, Asperger Syndrome, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review