Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing the anterior nare bacterial community of two discrete human populations using Illumina amplicon sequencing

Open access
Camarinha‐Silva, Amélia, Jáuregui, Ruy, Chaves‐Moreno, Diego, Oxley, Andrew P.A., Schaumburg, Frieder, Becker, Karsten, Wos‐Oxley, Melissa L., Pieper, Dietmar H.·2014·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: The anterior nares are an important reservoir for opportunistic pathogens and commensal microorganisms. A barcoded I llumina paired‐end sequencing method targeting the 16 S ribosomal RNA V 1‐2 hypervariable region was developed to compare the bacterial diversity of the anterior nares across distinct human populations (volunteers from G ermany vs a B abongo P ygmy tribe, A frica). Of the 251 phylotypes detected, 231 could be classified to the genus level and 109 to the species level, including the unambiguous identification of the ubiquitous S taphylococcus aureus and M oraxella catarrhalis . The global bacterial community of both adult populations revealed that they shared 85% of the phylotypes, suggesting that our global bacterial communities have likely been with us for thousands of years. Of the 34 phylotypes unique to the non‐westernized population, most were related to members within the suborder M icrococcineae . There was an even more overwelming distinction between children and adults of the same population, suggesting a progression of a childhood community of high‐diversity comprising species of M oraxellaceae and S treptococcaceae to an adult community of lower diversity comprising species of P ropionibacteriaceae , C lostridiales I ncertae S edis XI , C orynebacteriaceae and S taphylococcaceae . Thus, age was a stronger factor for accounting for differing bacterial assemblages than the origin of the human population sampled.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1462-2920.12362

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Camarinha‐Silva, A., Jáuregui, R., Chaves‐Moreno, D., Oxley, A. P. A., Schaumburg, F., Becker, K., Wos‐Oxley, M. L., & Pieper, D. H.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-16
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
2939-2952
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2151159165
Cited by
195
References
7
FWCI
14.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing the anterior nare bacterial community of two discrete human populations using Illumina amplicon sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1462-2920.12362
The paper
Camarinha‐Silva, A., Jáuregui, R., Chaves‐Moreno, D., Oxley, A. P. A., Schaumburg, F., Becker, K., Wos‐Oxley, M. L., & Pieper, D. H. (2014). Comparing the anterior nare bacterial community of two discrete human populations using Illumina amplicon sequencing. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.