The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Culture and Individual Judgment and Decision Making
Open accessAbstract
Au cours des deux dernie`res de´cennies, on a beaucoup publie´ sur la culture et la psychologie interculturelle d’une part, sur le jugement et la prise de de´cision d’autre part ( judgment and decision making: J/DM ). Ces deux domaines ont e´te´ rapproche´s par peu de chercheurs dont on passe ici en revue les travaux. On s’inte´resse plus particulie`rement a` quatre the`mes J/DM qui ont e´te´ aborde´s d’un point de vue interculturel: l’e´valuation de la probabilite´, la perception du risque, l’attrait du risque et les formes de prise de de´cision. Notre investigation souligne une orientation positive dans les recherches J/DM interculturelles a` savoir le passage d’une simple description des diffe´rences nationales a` travers les comportements apparents a` l’examen des processus sous‐jacents qui rendent compte de ces diffe´rences grâce au recours aux valeurs et aux perceptions marque´es par la culture. Pour encourager cette tendance, nous insistons pour que les futures e´tudes J/DM interculturelles soient davantage mode´lise´es (c’est‐a`‐dire qu’elles recherchent l’impact de V.I. changeant avec les cultures et ne se contentent pas de de´crire des diffe´rences entre groupes) et adoptent une approche en mosïque dans le recueil des donne´es (c’est‐a`‐dire une approche qui fait appel a` des me´thodes diversifie´es et met en e´vidence des preuves convergentes pour retenir ou rejeter un mode`le).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards
Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395199 · Cited by 513
Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States
Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.294 · Cited by 481
Shifting Selves and Decision Making: The Effects of Self-Construal Priming on Consumer Risk-Taking
Mandel, N. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/374700 · Cited by 406
Yates, J. F., & de Oliveira, S. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.003 · Cited by 308
The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits
Smaldino, P. E. (2014) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x13001544 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, E., & Hsee, C.
- Venue
- Applied Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-61
- ISSN
- 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0597
- OpenAlex
- W2083197785
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture and Individual Judgment and Decision Making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1464-0597.00005
- The paper
- Weber, E., & Hsee, C. (2000). Culture and Individual Judgment and Decision Making. Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.