Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 586

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antecedents and Consequences of Employees’ Adjustment to Overseas Assignment: A Meta‐analytic Review

Hechanova, Regina, Beehr, Terry A., Christiansen, Neil D.·2003·Applied Psychology

Abstract

La recherche sur les antécédents et les conséquences de l’ajustement des expatriés a été revue de façon qualitative et avec la méthode quantitative de méta‐analyse. Les prédicteurs individuels, environnementaux, reliés au travail et reliés à la famille, de l’ajustement général, interactionnel et au travail ont été analysés. L’efficacité personnelle, la fréquence des interactions dans le pays hôte, et le soutien familial ont prédit les trois types d’ajustement. De plus, des compétences élevées en relations interpersonnelles ont été associées à un meilleur ajustement à l’environnement en général. Les résultats ont également démontré que la variable “conflit de rôle”était corrélée négativement avec l’ajustement au travail alors que l’ambiguïté du rôle et la discrétion ont été associés avec l’ajustement au travail. Un modèle d’équations structurelles a été développé avec les corrélations agrégées pour illustrer les relations causales possibles impliquant un facteur général d’ajustement et les résultats des tensions au travail, la satisfaction au travail, l’engagement organisationnel, l’intention de quitter, ainsi que la performance au travail. L’hypothèse était que l’ajustement influencerait les tensions et la satisfaction au travail et que ces deux dernières variables auraient un effet sur l’engagement organisationnel, la performance et l’intention de quitter. Le modèle a bien correspondu aux données. Research on the antecedents and consequences of expatriate adjustment was reviewed using meta‐analytic methods. The antecedents and outcomes of three facets of adjustment were examined. Self‐efficacy, frequency of interaction with host nationals, and family support consistently predicted all three types of adjustment. In addition, better interpersonal skills were associated with greater adjustment to general environment. Greater cultural novelty was associated with less interactional adjustment. Role conflict, ambiguity, and discretion were also strong predictors of work adjustment. A structural equations model that illustrated causal relationships involving expatriate adjustment and outcomes of job strain, job satisfaction, organisational citizenship, intent to turnover, and job performance generated a good fit with the data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1464-0597.00132

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hechanova, R., Beehr, T. A., & Christiansen, N. D.
Venue
Applied Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03-10
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
213-236
ISSN
  • 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0597
OpenAlex
W1968435736
Cited by
586
References
2
FWCI
43.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.