Cited by 67Counseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Couples treatment for major depression: critique of the literature and suggestions for some different directions

Gupta, Maya, Coyne, James C., Beach, Steven R. H.·2003·Journal of Family Therapy

Abstract

Current couples approaches to the treatment of depression show considerable promise for some couples, but have substantial room for improvement – in terms of efficacy as well as applicability and acceptability to a broader population. Although conjoint approaches have been shown to be efficacious in reducing couple distress and are possibly efficacious in ameliorating depression that co‐occurs with couple distress, methodological problems hamper generalization from the published findings. Therefore, it is not clear that most depressed persons are likely to benefit from currently available conjoint formats. Most basically, there may often be obstacles that prevent or delay partner involvement, highlighting the need for treatments that can enhance relationship functioning without relying on a conjoint format. Existing treatment delivery systems may also fail to reach a considerable segment of the population. Developing a more flexible set of options for implementing couple‐focused treatment, as well as rethinking dominant assumptions about depression, may be integral to extending the viability of couples therapy for depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-6427.00253

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, M., Coyne, J. C., & Beach, S. R. H.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gupta, Maya
  • Coyne, James C.
  • Beach, Steven R. H.
Venue
Journal of Family Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-13
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
317-346
ISSN
  • 0163-4445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6427
OpenAlex
W2074442206
Cited by
67
References
73
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
couple therapy, major depressive disorder, couple distress, partner involvement, treatment acceptability, treatment delivery system, relationship functioning, treatment efficacy, methodological limitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review