The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theorizing Access: Forest Profits along Senegal's Charcoal Commodity Chain
Open accessAbstract
The questions at the centre of this article are: who profits from commercial forestry, and how? Through access mapping with commodity chain analysis, this study examines the distribution of benefits from Senegal's charcoal trade and the multiple market mechanisms underpinning that distribution. Benefits from charcoal are derived from direct control over forest access, as well as through access to markets, labour opportunities, capital, and state agents and officials. Access to these arenas is based on a number of inter‐related mechanisms including legal property, social identity, social relations, coercion and information control. A commodity chain is the series of relations through which an item passes, from extraction through conversion, exchange, transport, distribution and final use. Access mapping involves evaluating the distribution of benefits along the chain, and tracing out the mechanisms by which access to benefits is maintained. It sheds light on the limited role of property, the embedded nature of markets, and the role of extra‐legal structures and mechanisms in shaping equity and efficiency in resource use. It does so in a socially situated, multi‐local manner, spanning the geographic spread of production and exchange. It also illuminates the practical issues surrounding establishment of community participation in benefits from and control over natural resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x · Cited by 2,355
Self-citationRecentralizing While Decentralizing: How National Governments Reappropriate Forest Resources
Ribot, J. C., Agrawal, A., & Larson, A. M. (2006) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.020 · Cited by 958
Self-citationMcDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006 · Cited by 645
Woodfuels, livelihoods, and policy interventions: Changing Perspectives
Arnold, J. E. M., Köhlin, G., & Persson, R. (2006) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.08.008 · Cited by 441
First World Political Ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use Movement
McCarthy, J. (2002) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a3526 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Ribot, J. C.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-341
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W2169507536
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theorizing Access: Forest Profits along Senegal's Charcoal Commodity Chain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-7660.00080
- The paper
- Ribot, J. C. (1998). Theorizing Access: Forest Profits along Senegal's Charcoal Commodity Chain. Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.