Cited by 478Land Rights and ReformsAgricultural economics and policiesAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Getting Institutions “Right” for Whom? Credit Constraints and the Impact of Property Rights on the Quantity and Composition of Investment

Open access
Carter, Michael R., Olinto, Pedro·2003·American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

Abstract Property rights reform is typically hypothesized to boost investment through investment demand and credit supply effects. Yet when the credit supply effect is muted, property rights reform would be expected to induce liquidity‐constrained farms to reduce investment in movable capital even as they increase investment in attached capital. This expectation is corroborated by econometric analysis of panel data from Paraguay. While all farmers experience a positive investment demand effect, liquidity‐constrained producers correspondingly reduce their demand for movable capital. Given an estimated pattern of wealth‐biased liquidity constraints, property rights reform will get institutions “right” for only wealthier producers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8276.00111

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Prosterman, Roy (1998). "Efficiency and equity implications of different land tenure options: Evidence and the way ahead," paper presented at the Land Tenure, Land Market, and Productivity in Rural China conference, Beijing, May 15-16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, M. R., & Olinto, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
Venue
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
173-186
ISSN
  • 0002-9092 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8276
OpenAlex
W2234052880
Cited by
478
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 30
FWCI
19.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
property rights reform, credit constraints, liquidity constraints, agricultural investment, investment demand, credit supply, agricultural institutions, Paraguay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review