Cited by 39Anthropological Studies and InsightsPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesAnthropology: Ethics, History, Culture

Artificially maintained controversies: Global warming and Fijian cannibalism

Sahlins, Marshall·2003·Anthropology Today

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8322.00189

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahlins, M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Sahlins, Marshall
Venue
Anthropology Today
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
3-5
ISSN
  • 0268-540X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8322
OpenAlex
W2076127437
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthropology Today (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Keywords
global warming, cannibalism, Fiji, climate change controversy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review