Cited by 1,102Urban Planning and GovernanceHousing, Finance, and NeoliberalismUrban Planning and Valuation

Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy

Open access
Swyngedouw, Erik, Moulaert, Frank, Rodriguez, Arantxa·2002·Antipode

Abstract

This paper summarizes the theoretical insights drawn from a study of thirteen large–scale urban development projects (UDPs) in twelve European Union countries. The project focused on the way in which globalization and liberalization articulate with the emergence of new forms of governance, on the formation of a new scalar gestalt of governing and on the relationship between large–scale urban development and political, social and economic power relations in the city. Among the most important conclusions, we found that: •Large–scale UDPs have increasingly been used as a vehicle to establish exceptionality measures in planning and policy procedures. This is part of a neoliberal “New Urban Policy” approach and its selective “middle — and upper–class” democracy. It is associated with new forms of “governing” urban interventions, characterized by less democratic and more elite–driven priorities. •Local democratic participation mechanisms are not respected or are applied in a very “formalist” way, resulting in a new choreography of elite power. However, grassroots movements occasionally manage to turn the course of events in favor of local participation and of modest social returns for deprived social groups. •The UDPs are poorly integrated at best into the wider urban process and planning system. As a consequence, their impact on a city as a whole and on the areas where the projects are located remains ambiguous. •Most UDPs accentuate socioeconomic polarization through the working of real–estate markets (price rises and displacement of social or low–income housing), changes in the priorities of public budgets that are increasingly redirected from social objectives to investments in the built environment and the restructuring of the labor market. •The UDPs reflect and embody a series of processes that are associated with changing spatial scales of governance; these changes, in turn, reflect a shifting geometry of power in the governing of urbanization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8330.00254

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mega projects involve a multitude of actors spread over different scales and are expected to be accompanied by new forms of governing urban interventions.

    “Mega projects involve a multitude of actors spread over different scales and are expected to be accompanied by new forms of governing urban interventions (Swyngedouw et al. 2002).”

    From Urban imaginaries: funding mega infrastructure projects in Lagos, Nigeria (2018) · cites this paper as Swyngedouw et al. 2002

  • Large-scale urban development or mega projects have been described as some of the most visible and ubiquitous urban revitalization strategies initiated by city elites in search of economic growth and market competitiveness.

    “large-scale urban development or mega projects have been described as some of ''the most visible and ubiquitous urban revitalization strategies'' initiated by city elites in search of economic growth and market competitiveness (Swyngedouw et al. 2002, p. 551).”

    From Urban imaginaries: funding mega infrastructure projects in Lagos, Nigeria (2018) · cites this paper as Swyngedouw et al. 2002

  • The notion that elitist projects are accompanied by benefits that trickle down to the poor is common even though there is little evidence to support it.

    “The notion that elitist projects are accompanied by benefits that would somehow trickle down to the poor is a common one even though there is little evidence to support it (see Swyngedouw et al. 2002).”

    From Urban imaginaries: funding mega infrastructure projects in Lagos, Nigeria (2018) · cites this paper as Swyngedouw et al. 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. Oxford University Press, 2000). nuevos instrumentos para la revitalización metro- politana," in Encuentros de Desarrollo Local y Empleo (Coruña, 1998), and "Planning the Revitalisation of an Old Industrial City: Urban Policy Innovations in Metropolitan Bilbao," in Local Economic Development in Europe and the Americas (edited by C Demazière and P Wilson, Mansell, 1996).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Université de Lille (FR)
Venue
Antipode
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
542-577
ISSN
  • 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8330
OpenAlex
W2031597838
Cited by
1,102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 36
FWCI
33.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antipode (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Valuation
Keywords
neoliberalism, urban governance, elite democracy, grassroots movements, socioeconomic polarization, real estate market, housing displacement, urban planning, European Union cities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review