The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence
Abstract
The entry of the 1997 cohort of Labour women into public life offers a test case of whether, and under what conditions, women politicians have the capacity to ‘make a substantive difference’. We outlines the theory of the politics of presence and discuss how to operationalise this in a testable model. We, use the British Representation Study survey of 1,000 national politicians (including parliamentary candidates and elected Members of Parliament) conducted in the 2001 general election. The analysis centres on the impact of gender on five scales measuring attitudes and values on issues that commonly divide British party politics. Once we control for party, there are no significant differences among women and men politicians across the value scales concerning the free market economy, Europe, and moral traditionalism. Yet on the values most directly related to women's interests – namely the affirmative action and the gender equality scales – women and men politicians differ significantly within each party, even after controlling for other common social background variables that explain attitudes, such as their age, education, and income. The conclusion considers why these findings matter for the composition of parliament, the public policy agenda and for women's roles as political leaders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fenichel Pitkin, H. (1967) · doi:10.1525/9780520340503 · Cited by 5,162
Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women
Kanter, R. M. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226425 · Cited by 3,154
Cited by
Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research
Grey, S. (2006) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x06221147 · Cited by 242
Childs, S., & Lovenduski, J. (2013) · The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0019 · Cited by 166
Self-citation'Thick' Conceptions of Substantive Representation: Women, Gender and Political Institutions
Mackay, F. (2008) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344890802079607 · Cited by 135
Adcock, C. (2010) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680771003672254 · Cited by 79
Sanhueza Petrarca, C. (2020) · Lowering the Voting Age to 16 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_6 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovenduski, J., & Norris, P.
- Venue
- Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-102
- ISSN
- 0032-3217 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9248
- OpenAlex
- W1970042411
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9248.00414
- The paper
- Lovenduski, J., & Norris, P. (2003). Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00414
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.