The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intention and Analogy in Children's Naming of Pictorial Representations
Abstract
What underlies children's naming of representations, such as when they call a statue of a clothespin “a clothespin”? One possibility is that they focus exclusively on shape, extending the name “clothespin” only to entities that are shaped like typical clothespins. An alternative possibility is that they extend a word that refers to an object to any representation of that object, and that shape is relevant because it is a reliable indicator of representational intent. We explored these possibilities by asking 3- and 4-year-olds to describe pictures that represented objects through intention and analogy. The results suggest that it is children's appreciation of representation that underlies their naming; sameness of shape is neither necessary nor sufficient. We conclude by considering whether this account might apply more generally to artifacts other than pictorial representations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development
Keil, F. C. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Zaitchik, D. (1990) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90036-j · Cited by 420
Cited by
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000129 · Cited by 4,882
The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought
Gelman, S. A. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001 · Cited by 1,247
Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions
Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., & Needham, A. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.004 · Cited by 817
Advances in the Cross‐Linguistic Study of Ideophones
Dingemanse, M. (2012) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1002/lnc3.361 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloom, P., & Markson, L.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 200-204
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2152364206
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intention and Analogy in Children's Naming of Pictorial Representations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9280.00038
- The paper
- Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and Analogy in Children's Naming of Pictorial Representations. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
