The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Second Thoughts versus Second Looks: An Age-Related Deficit in Reflectively Refreshing Just-Activated Information
Abstract
Age-related deficits in memory are greater as encoding and retrieval tasks require more reflective (self-generated or executive) processing. One problem in developing more specific models of age-related changes in cognition is that the tasks studied tend to be complex and vary in the combinations of component cognitive processes they recruit. Here we report an age-related deficit in one of the most elementary, but critical, components of reflection: refreshing a just-activated representation. Impairment in such a process potentially has a wide-ranging impact on all higher-order cognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words.
Tulving, E. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043150 · Cited by 867
Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates
Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80090-3 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies
Baddeley, A. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422 · Cited by 4,271
A taxonomy of external and internal attention.
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427 · Cited by 1,472
Selection, Integration, and Conflict Monitoring
Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00851-1 · Cited by 466
Aging and the Intersection of Cognition, Motivation, and Emotion
CARSTENSEN, L., MIKELS, J., & MATHER, M. (2006) · Handbook of the Psychology of Aging · doi:10.1016/b9-78-012101-2/64950-0185 · Cited by 372
Vaughan, L., & Giovanello, K. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017729 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, M. K., Reeder, J. A., Raye, C. L., & Mitchell, K. J.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-67
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2164728387
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second Thoughts versus Second Looks: An Age-Related Deficit in Reflectively Refreshing Just-Activated Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9280.00411
- The paper
- Johnson, M. K., Reeder, J. A., Raye, C. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2002). Second Thoughts versus Second Looks: An Age-Related Deficit in Reflectively Refreshing Just-Activated Information. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
