Cited by 180Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates

Allen, Gordon A., Mahler, William A., Estes, W.K.·1969·Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80090-3

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The testing effect occurs even without corrective feedback.

    “The testing effect is observed even when no corrective feedback is given (Allen et al., 1969;Carpenter & DeLosh, 2005, 2006;Kuo & Hirshman, 1996), so it cannot be attributed solely to more efficient processing of feedback in the test condition.”

    From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Allen et al., 1969

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1969-08
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
463-470
ISSN
0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144489531
Cited by
180
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
paired-associate learning, long-term retention, recall tests, stereotypy, intrusion errors, response latency, error rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review