The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes
Abstract
A new choice task was used to explore infants' spontaneous representations of more and less. Ten- and 12-month-old infants saw crackers placed sequentially into two containers, then were allowed to crawl and obtain the crackers from the container they chose. Infants chose the larger quantity with comparisons of 1 versus 2 and 2 versus 3, but failed with comparisons of 3 versus 4, 2 versus 4, and 3 versus 6. Success with visible arrays ruled out a motivational explanation for failure in the occluded 3-versus-6 condition. Control tasks ruled out the possibility that presentation duration guided choice, and showed that presentation complexity was not responsible for the failure with larger numbers. When crackers were different sizes, total surface area or volume determined choice. The infants' pattern of success and failure supports the hypothesis that they relied on object-file representations, comparing mental models via total volume or surface area rather than via one-to-one correspondence between object files.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience
Block, N. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07002786 · Cited by 1,146
Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain
Rushworth, M. F. S., & Walton, M. E. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.005 · Cited by 658
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Perdue, B. M., Talbot, C. F., Stone, A. M., & Beran, M. J. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0521-y · Cited by 115
Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)
Irie-Sugimoto, N., Kobayashi, T., Sato, T., & Hasegawa, T. (2009) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0185-9 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 150-156
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2160556050
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9280.00427
- The paper
- Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. (2002). The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00427
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.