The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commodified Meanings, Meaningful Commodities: Re–thinking Production–Consumption Links through the Organic System of Provision
Abstract
Agro–food researchers have yet to systematically theorize how the social life of food intersects with a political economy of food production. Yet without such understanding, activists are unlikely to affect the politics of production in intended ways. It is crucial to understand how the meanings that animate the politics of consumption are translated and distributed as surplus value and rent, and, for that matter, how surplus value and rent value are translated into meanings. This paper is a preliminary attempt to further that understanding by considering these translations in organic food provision. It begins with some recent interventions in conceptualizing taste and then explores their significance in value creation and distribution. It then considers what they offer in understanding the taste for organics specifically. Ultimately, I argue that certain of these tastes present considerable, if different, problems for the commodification of organic food, which are only resolved by a re–making of organic meanings together with unintended distributions of value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
Law, J. (1992) · Systems Practice · doi:10.1007/bf01059830 · Cited by 3,244
Cited by
Rural Europe Redux? Reflections on Alternative Agro‐Food Networks and Paradigm Change
Goodman, D. (2004) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00258.x · Cited by 585
The Polanyian Way? Voluntary Food Labels as Neoliberal Governance
Guthman, J. (2007) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00535.x · Cited by 454
Self-citationEmbodying Neoliberalism: Economy, Culture, and the Politics of Fat
Guthman, J., & DuPuis, M. (2006) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d3904 · Cited by 391
Self-citationHolloway, L., Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E., & Tuomainen, H. (2007) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00427.x · Cited by 314
“Value Grabbing”: A Political Ecology of Rent
Andreucci, D., García-Lamarca, M., Wedekind, J., & Swyngedouw, E. (2017) · Capitalism Nature Socialism · doi:10.1080/10455752.2016.1278027 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Guthman, J.
- Venue
- Sociologia Ruralis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 295-311
- ISSN
- 0038-0199 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9523
- OpenAlex
- W2032336706
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Commodified Meanings, Meaningful Commodities: Re–thinking Production–Consumption Links through the Organic System of Provision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9523.00218
- The paper
- Guthman, J. (2002). Commodified Meanings, Meaningful Commodities: Re–thinking Production–Consumption Links through the Organic System of Provision. Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.