The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Social Systems Be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's Social Theory
Abstract
The theory of autopoiesis, that is systems that are self-producing or self-constructing, was originally developed to explain the particular nature of living as opposed to non-living entities. It was subsequently enlarged to encompass cognition and language leading to what is known as second-order cybernetics. However, as with earlier biological theories, many authors have tried to extend the domain of the theory to encompass social systems, the most notable being Luhmann. The purpose of this article is to consider critically the extent to which the theory of autopoiesis, as originally defined, can be applied to social systems – that is, whether social systems are autopoietic. And, if it cannot, whether some weaker version might be appropriate.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Feedback controls in biological organisms or cultural systems implement and maintain organization and purposiveness: ' in the social world . . . we see many groupings -families, companies, religions, cultures and societies -that exhibit long-term stability and persistence despite enormous changes in their environment, and their own internal membership and structure ' (Mingers 2002: 281).”
From Religion as a Complex and Dynamic System (2013) · cites this paper as Mingers 2002: 281
In the citing paper
“These systems are: self-producing; contingently maintained (so that they don't breakdown); structurally open but organizationally closed; structurally determined; able to be structurally coupled to other systems by mutual specification and/or co-evolution; and able to embrace embodied cognition and self-reference/recursion to enable self-construction/production (Mingers, 2002, p. 280).”
From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Mingers, 2002
In the citing paper
“This can be achieved through the nature and dynamics of autopoiesis or self-producing/constructing physical systems (Bunker et al., 2013;Mingers, 2002Mingers, , 2004)).”
From Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action (2022) · cites this paper as Mingers, 2002
Citations
Cites
Powers, C. H., & Giddens, A. (1988) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579442 · Cited by 8,854
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
The theory of communicative action
Edgar, A. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315710495-5 · Cited by 8,669
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980) · Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4 · Cited by 5,815
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1991) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 · Cited by 5,765
Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis.
Louis, M. R., Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392394 · Cited by 5,576
How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics
Hayles, N. K. (1999) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001 · Cited by 5,284
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living
Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., & Beer, S. (1980) · Cited by 4,667
International Social Science Journal
(1963) · Anthropology News · doi:10.1111/an.1963.4.7.6.1 · Cited by 2,733
An Invitation to Social Construction
Gergen, K. J. (2015) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781473921276 · Cited by 2,704
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Buckley W., 1968, Modern Systems Research for the Behavioural Scientist
- Grosz E., 1994, Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism
- Habermas J., 1971, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie
- Luhmann N., 1984, Soziale Systeme
- Luhmann N., 1986, Sociocybernetic Paradoxes
- Luhmann N., 1987, Autopoiesis and the Law, 335
- Luhmann N., 1987, Autopoiesis and the Law, 12
- Luhmann N., 1989, Northwestern University Law Review, 83, 136
- Luhmann N., 1990, Essays in Self-Reference
- Luhmann N., 1992, Cardozo Law Review, 13, 1419
- Luhmann N., 1995, Social Systems
- Manicas P., 1998, Critical Realism: Essential Readings, 313
- Maturana H., 1975, Encyclopedie de la Pleiade, Series Methodique
- Maturana H., 1978, Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honour of Eric Lenneberg, 27
- Maturana H., 1980, Autopoietic Systems in the Social Sciences, 11
- Maturana H., 1987, Physics of Cognitive Processes, 324
- Maturana H., 1993, Zeichen (Theorie) in der Praxis, 37
- Maturana H., 1995, Consciousness: Distinction and Reflection
- Maturana H., 1995, Biology Research, 28, 15
- Mingers J., 2001, Information and Organization (formerly Accounting, Management and Information Technology), 11, 103
- Morgan G., 1986, Images of Organisation
- Stokes P., 1990, Self-Steering and Cognition in Complex Systems: Towards a New Cybernetics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations
Etzkowitz, H. (2003) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/05390184030423002 · Cited by 1,691
A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002 · Cited by 1,002
“ng approach is to consider the overall process as a social communication system. One could use Luhmann’s (1995; 1996) theory of society as being based on autopoietic communication (Leydesdorff, 2007; Mingers, 2002). Different functional subsystems within society, e.g., science, generate their own organizationally clos…”
BackgroundDwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., Andreini, D., Abumoghli, I., Barlette, Y., Bunker, D., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456 · Cited by 761
“This can be achieved through the nature and dynamics of autopoiesis or self-producing/constructing physical systems (Bunker et al., 2013; Mingers, 2002, 2004).”
BackgroundMingers, J., & White, L. (2009) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.019 · Cited by 499
“In fact many practitioners have used SSM in parts and/or with other approaches (Mingers and Brocklesby 1997; Munro and Mingers 2002b).”
BackgroundEconomics of Digital Ecosystems
Barykin, S., Kapustina, I., Kirillova, T. V., Yadykin, V. K., & Konnikov, Y. A. (2020) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc6040124 · Cited by 144
“His limited (reductionist) view of the ecosystem as a semblance of an ecological system was further expanded in studies [15,16].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mingers, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mingers, John
- ORCID
- Mingers, John
- Venue
- The Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-299
- ISSN
- 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-954X
- OpenAlex
- W1978626743
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › German Social Sciences and History
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Keywords
- autopoiesis, social systems, Niklas Luhmann, second-order cybernetics, self-production, social theory, systems theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
