Cited by 88Critical Realism in SociologyContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticePhilosophy and History of Science

Can social systems be autopoietic? Bhaskar's and Giddens’ social theories

MINGERS, JOHN·2004·Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Abstract

The theory of autopoiesis, that is systems that are self‐producing or self‐constructing, was originally developed to explain the particular nature of living as opposed to non‐living entities. It was subsequently enlarged to encompass cognition and language leading to what is known as second‐order cybernetics. However, as with earlier biological theories, many authors have tried to extend the domain of the theory to encompass social systems, the most notable being Luhmann. The pur‐pose of this paper is to consider critically the extent to which the theory of autopoiesis, as originally defined, can be applied to social systems‐that is, whether social systems are autopoietic. And, if it cannot, whether some weaker version might be appropriate. It addresses this question by considering whether autopoiesis can be applied to the theoretical conceptions of Giddens and Bhaskar. It follows an earlier paper that evaluated Luhmann's autopoietic social theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00256.x

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MINGERS, J.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
MINGERS, JOHN
Venue
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
403-427
ISSN
  • 0021-8308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5914
OpenAlex
W2097970422
Cited by
88
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
autopoiesis, social systems, social theory, Bhaskar, Anthony Giddens, Niklas Luhmann, second-order cybernetics, self-production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review