The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates the new and unique medium of the Internet as a source of information about health. The Internet is an inherently interactive environment that transcends established national boundaries, regulations and distinctions between professions and expertise. The paper reports findings from a qualitative study of households who routinely used the Internet to access health information and examines how it affected their health beliefs and behaviours. The public use of previously obscure and inaccessible medical information is placed in the context of the debate about deprofessionalisation. It is shown that it is the users of Internet information rather than authors orprofessional experts who decided what and how material is accessed and used. It is concluded that the Internet forms the site of a new struggle over expertise in health that will transform the relationship between the health professions and their clients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring personal computer adoption dynamics
Lin, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838159809364436 · Cited by 208
Units of Analysis for Internet Communication
December, J. (1996) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01459.x · Cited by 163
Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet
(2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.3.513 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Internet Health Information Seeking and the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Systematic Review
Tan, S. S.-L., & Goonawardene, N. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5729 · Cited by 1,101
Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections
Nicolini, D. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609349875 · Cited by 1,017
Health lifestyle theory and the convergence of agency and structure
Cockerham, W. C. (2005) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650504600105 · Cited by 979
The Social Construction of Illness: Key Insights and Policy Implications
Conrad, P., & Barker, K. K. (2010) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146510383495 · Cited by 888
Cotten, S. R., & Gupta, S. S. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020 · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Authors
- Hardey, M.
- Venue
- Sociology of Health & Illness
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 820-835
- ISSN
- 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9566
- OpenAlex
- W2110641512
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9566.00185
- The paper
- Hardey, M. (1999). Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health & Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.