Cited by 45Mental Health Treatment and AccessCultural Competency in Health CareIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

Poles apart: does the export of mental health expertise from the Global North to the Global South represent a neutral relocation of knowledge and practice?

Open access
Cox, Nigel, Webb, Lucy·2015·Sociology of Health & Illness

Abstract

The World Health Organization's Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020 identifies actions for all member states to alleviate the global burden of mental ill health, including an obligation for mental healthcare to be delivered in a 'culturally appropriate' manner. In this article we argue that such a requirement is problematic, not least because such pronouncements remain framed by the normative prepositions of Western medical and psychological practice and their associated ethical, legal and institutional standpoints. As such, when striving to export Western mental health expertise, different paradigms for evidence will be necessary to deliver locally meaningful interventions to low and middle income countries. Our discussion highlights a number of philosophical concerns regarding methodologies for future research practice, including those relating to representation and exclusion in the guise of epistemic injury, presumptive methodologies arising from Western notions of selfhood, and related ethical issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9566.12230

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mental health programmes in the Global South have often perpetrated epistemic violence or injustice by validating one knowledge system over another, replicating colonial dynamics and obscuring real needs.

    “mental health programmes, particularly when implemented in the Global South, have often been noted to perpetrate forms of 'epistemic violence' or 'injustice' (Watters 2017;Cox and Webb 2015;Burgess 2022), instances in which one system of knowledge is validated over another, thus replicating colonial dynamics of knowledge production and imposition, frequently resulting in real needs being obscured.”
  • Resistance to psychoactive medication ranges from grassroots user/survivor movements that denounce human rights violations to therapeutics oriented toward non-pharmacological recovery-based frameworks.

    “Resistance against psychoactive medication ranges from grassroot networks such as “user” and “survivor” movements, denouncing the ways in which psychopharmaceuticals can be used to violate human rights, to the rise of therapeutics explicitly oriented towards non-pharmacological, 'recovery'-based frameworks (Cox and Webb 2015;Giordano 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Cox, N., & Webb, L.
Affiliations
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Cox, Nigel
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-13
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
683-697
ISSN
  • 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9566
OpenAlex
W1981220424
Cited by
45
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
cultural appropriateness, Western epistemology, selfhood, research ethics, low- and middle-income countries, global mental health, epistemic injustice
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Developing Countries, Health Status, Humans, Human Rights, Medicine, Traditional, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Residence Characteristics, Self Concept, Sociology, Medical, Global Health, World Health Organization, Developed Countries, Cultural Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review