CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 359Indian and Buddhist StudiesCross-Cultural and Social AnalysisStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A free gift makes no friends

Laidlaw, James·2000·Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
DOI 10.1111/1467-9655.00036
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The giving of alms to Shvetambar Jain renouncers is a specific institutionalized elaboration of the idea of a free gift, an idea which all the major world religions have their own ways of instantiating, and which in north Indian languages is expressed by the word dan . This example illustrates the inherently paradoxical nature of the idea of a gift, and why it is a mistake to define the gift as necessarily reciprocal and non‐alienated. Like the pure commodity, the pure gift is characterized by the fact that it does not create personal connections and obligations between the parties. This understanding of the gift, which is implicit in Mauss, enables us to resolve the apparent paradox in the ethnography of dan , that although it is a free gift it is often harmful to its recipients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9655.00036

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–356 of 356

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Laidlaw, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Laidlaw, James
ORCID
Laidlaw, James
Venue
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
617-634
ISSN
  • 1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9655
DOI
10.1111/1467-9655.00036
OpenAlex
W2132754605
Cited by
359
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 910 d)
Locations
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
free gifts, Dan, almsgiving, gift exchange, reciprocity, alienation, Marcel Mauss, gift theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review