The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inference for Non-random Samples
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Observational data are often analysed as if they had resulted from a controlled study, and yet the tacit assumption of randomness can be crucial for the validity of inference. We take some simple statistical models and supplement them by adding a parameter θ which reflects the degree of non-randomness in the sample. For a randomized study θ is known to be 0. We examine the profile log-likelihood for θ and the sensitivity of inference to small non-zero values of θ. Particular models cover the analysis of survey data with item non-response, the paired comparison t-test and two group comparisons using observational data with covariates. Some practical examples are discussed. Allowing for sampling bias increases the uncertainty of estimation and weakens the significance of treatment effects, sometimes substantially so.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Causality: Some Statistical Aspects
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.2307/2982962 · Cited by 277
Cited by
Statistical Classification Methods in Consumer Credit Scoring: A Review
Hand, D. J., & Henley, W. E. (1997) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.1997.00078.x · Cited by 1,042
Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference
Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009211805 · Cited by 933
The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology
Oakes, J. M. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.004 · Cited by 760
The Skew-Normal and Related Families
Azzalini, A., & Capitanio, A. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139248891 · Cited by 710
Multiple-bias modelling for analysis of observational data
Greenland, S. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.00349.x · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- Copas, J. B., & Li, H. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-95
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2129542896
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inference for Non-random Samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9868.00055
- The paper
- Copas, J. B., & Li, H. G. (1997). Inference for Non-random Samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.