Cited by 277Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesBayesian Modeling and Causal InferencePhilosophy and History of Science

Causality: Some Statistical Aspects

Cox, D. R.·1992·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society)

Abstract

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) is currently published by Royal Statistical Society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2982962

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cox, D. R.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society)
Published
1992
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
291
ISSN
0964-1998 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983225354
Cited by
277
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
causality, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review