Cited by 989Monetary Policy and Economic ImpactEconomic Growth and ProductivityGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies

Financial Development and Economic Growth: Assessing the Evidence

Arestis, Philip, Demetriades, Panicos·1997·The Economic Journal

Abstract

In this paper we take a fresh look at the empirical evidence on the relationship between financial development and economic growth with a view to identifying outstanding issues and offering some suggestions about how these may be addressed in the future. To illustrate our suggestions we also present some new evidence utilising the proposed approaches. We examine the empirical literature from two angles. The first is the issue of whether, how and to what extent the financial system can contribute to the process of economic growth. Questions about the association amongst financial deepening, investment, and the efficiency of capital fall in this category. The question of causality between finance and growth can also be considered from this perspective. The second angle relates to the question of whether financial liberalisation can stimulate investment and growth. Evidence on this question has been adduced from countries where financial reforms took place. There is, also, a voluminous econometric evidence purporting to address this question by examining interest rate elasticities in saving, investment and growth equations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00043.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Finance exerts a causal impact on growth.

    “A considerable body of work suggests that finance exerts a causal impact on growth (e.g., Demetriades and Hussein 1996;Arestis and Demetriades 1997;Neusser and Kugler 1998;Rousseau andWachtel 1998, 2000;Rousseau and Sylla 1999;Arestis, Demetriades and Luintel 2000;Xu 2000;Christopoulos and Tsionas 2004;Ang and Madsen 2012).”

    From Finance, Growth, and Inequality (2021) · cites this paper as Arestis and Demetriades 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arestis, P., & Demetriades, P.
Affiliations
  • University of East London (GB)
  • Keele University (GB)
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
1997-05
Volume
107
Issue
442
Pages
783-799
ISSN
0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156969991
Cited by
989
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 43
FWCI
35.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Keywords
financial development, economic growth, financial deepening, investment, capital efficiency, causality between finance and growth, financial liberalization, financial reform, interest rate elasticity, savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review