The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Pre‐programme Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Programme. Implications for Simple Programme Evaluation Strategies
Abstract
The key to estimating the impact of a programme is constructing the counterfactual outcome representing what would have happened in its absence. This problem becomes more complicated when agents, such as individuals, firms or local governments, self‐select into the programme rather than being exogenously assigned to it. This paper uses data from a major social experiment to identify what would have happened to the earnings of self‐selected participants in a job training programme had they not participated in it. We investigate the implications of these earnings patterns for the validity of widely‐used before‐after and difference‐in‐differences estimators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Self-citationCharacterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2999630 · Cited by 2,286
Self-citationEstimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings
Ashenfelter, O. (1978) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1924332 · Cited by 1,515
Cited by
SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x · Cited by 6,238
Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?
A. Smith, J., & E. Todd, P. (2005) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · Cited by 3,176
Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Wong, V. C. (2008) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.20375 · Cited by 604
Cleaning House: The Impact of Information Technology Monitoring on Employee Theft and Productivity
Pierce, L., Snow, D. C., & McAfee, A. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2103 · Cited by 251
‘Naming and shaming for conservation: evidence from the Brazilian Amazon’
Cisneros, E., Zhou, S. L., & Börner, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136402 · Cited by 132
Kluve, J., Puerto, S., Robalino, D., Romero, J. M., Rother, F., Stöterau, J., Weidenkaff, F., & Witte, M. (2017) · Campbell Systematic Reviews: Better Evidence for a Better World · doi:10.4073/csr.2017.12 · Cited by 106
Quantile treatment effects in difference in differences models with panel data
Callaway, B., & Li, T. (2019) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe935 · Cited by 110
Achievement and behavior in charter schools: drawing a more complete picture
Imberman, S. A. (2011) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00077 · Cited by 98
The anticipatory effects of Medicare Part D on drug utilization
Alpert, A. (2016) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.004 · Cited by 69
(2013) · MDRC · Cited by 45
MEDICAL REGULATION AND HEALTH OUTCOMES: THE EFFECT OF THE PHYSICIAN EXAMINATION REQUIREMENT
Cotet, A. M., & Benjamin, D. K. (2013) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.2807 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Heckman, J. J., & Smith, J. A.
- Venue
- The Economic Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 457
- Pages
- 313-348
- ISSN
- 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0297
- OpenAlex
- W2057184365
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
