The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Counterproductive Behaviors
Open accessAbstract
Little systematic research on personality measures has been directed at investigating whether the Big Five are predictors of counterproductive behaviors such as absenteeism, accidents, deviant behaviors, and turnover. For example, published meta‐analyses did not investigate whether the Big Five personality factors predicted these criteria. The results of the meta‐analyses carried out here showed that conscientiousness predicted deviant behaviors and turnover, and extroversion, openness, agreeableness and emotional stability predicted the turnover criterion. However, none of the Big Five personality measures were found to be predictors of absenteeism or accidents. The implications of these findings for future research and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219 · Cited by 1,829 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, meta-analyses with a small number of correlations in some cells have been carried out when the area of investigation is theoretically relevant and important (see, for example, Ackerman and Heggestad 1997).”
Method
Cited by
The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage
Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., Beal, S. A., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036 · Cited by 955
Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes
Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.01.003 · Cited by 929
MOUNT, M., ILIES, R., & JOHNSON, E. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x · Cited by 699
Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.40 · Cited by 423
Junglas, I. A., Johnson, N. A., & Spitzmüller, C. (2008) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.29 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Salgado, J. F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Selection and Assessment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 117-125
- ISSN
- 0965-075X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2063967799
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Counterproductive Behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-2389.00198
- The paper
- Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Counterproductive Behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
