The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior
Abstract
The study investigated the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior (CWB) by examining the relationships between various counterproductive behaviors. Utilizing a university alumni sample (N = 343), data was collected through both self–report and direct judgments of the likelihood of co–occurrence. Eleven categories of CWB were examined: (1) Theft and Related Behavior; (2) Destruction of Property; (3) Misuse of Information; (4) Misuse of Time and Resources; (5) Unsafe Behavior; (6) Poor Attendance; (7) Poor Quality Work; (8) Alcohol Use; (9) Drug Use; (10) Inappropriate Verbal Actions; and (11) Inappropriate Physical Actions. CWB items and categories were generally positively related. Multidimensional scaling analysis suggests that the CWB categories vary on two dimensions: an Interpersonal–Organizational dimension and a Task Relevance dimension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
A TYPOLOGY OF DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIORS: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING STUDY.
ROBINSON, S. L., & BENNETT, R. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256693 · Cited by 3,393
Development of a measure of workplace deviance.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.349 · Cited by 3,066
Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice.
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. G. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.82.3.434 · Cited by 2,286
Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.
Campbell, J. P. (1990) · Cited by 1,476
Öneş, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.78.4.679 · Cited by 1,081
“Banana Time”: Job Satisfaction and Informal Interaction
Roy, D. F. (1959) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.18.4.07j88hr1p4074605 · Cited by 1,024
Other People's Money. A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement
Jacobs, J. A., & Cressey, D. R. (1954) · The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science · doi:10.2307/1140029 · Cited by 1,007
Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(1996)22:3<161::aid-ab1>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 724
Quota Restriction and Goldbricking in a Machine Shop
Roy, D. (1952) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/221011 · Cited by 652
Cited by
Personality and Individual Differences
Smith, M. B., Jordan, P., & Wallace, J. C. (2015) · The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Occupational Safety and Workplace Health · doi:10.1002/9781118979013.ch2 · Cited by 2,577
Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0099 · Cited by 2,049
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017103 · Cited by 1,690
Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082 · Cited by 1,297
MOUNT, M., ILIES, R., & JOHNSON, E. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x · Cited by 699
Metadata
- Authors
- Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Selection and Assessment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-42
- ISSN
- 0965-075X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2000414799
- Cited by
- 688
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-2389.00224
- The paper
- Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
