The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Do White Americans Support the Death Penalty?
Abstract
This article explores the roots of white support for capital punishment in the United States. Our analysis addresses individual-level and contextual factors, paying particular attention to how racial attitudes and racial composition influence white support for capital punishment. Our findings suggest that white support hinges on a range of attitudes wider than prior research has indicated, including social and governmental trust and individualist and authoritarian values. Extending individual-level analyses, we also find that white responses to capital punishment are sensitive to local context. Perhaps most important, our results clarify the impact of race in two ways. First, racial prejudice emerges here as a comparatively strong predictor of white support for the death penalty. Second, black residential proximity functions to polarize white opinion along lines of racial attitude. As the black percentage of county residents rises, so too does the impact of racial prejudice on white support for capital punishment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology
Thorne, S. E., Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/793261 · Cited by 3,642
From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology
N., E., Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2019397 · Cited by 3,607
Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175043 · Cited by 3,597
Social dominance: an intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3413 · Cited by 3,376
Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation
King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669316 · Cited by 3,232
THE NATURE OF BELIEF SYSTEMS IN MASS PUBLICS
Converse, P. E. (2004) · Aarhus University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.35529187.18 · Cited by 2,499
Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111684 · Cited by 2,421
Cited by
THE CENTRALITY OF RACE IN AMERICAN POLITICS
Hutchings, V. L., & Valentino, N. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104859 · Cited by 493
The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence
Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S. L., & Boydstun, A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790638 · Cited by 242
Why Whites Favor Spending More Money to Fight Crime: The Role of Racial Prejudice
BARKAN, S. E., & COHN, S. F. (2005) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.2.300 · Cited by 181
McCann, S. J. H. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.913 · Cited by 116
Framing innocence: an experimental test of the effects of wrongful convictions on public opinion
Norris, R. J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-019-09360-7 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Soss, J., Langbein, L., & Metelko, A. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397-421
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W1946644184
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 30.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Do White Americans Support the Death Penalty? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00006
- The paper
- Soss, J., Langbein, L., & Metelko, A. R. (2003). Why Do White Americans Support the Death Penalty? The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
