The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right
Open accessAbstract
This paper explores the factors that have recently increased support for candidates and causes of the populist right across the developed democracies, especially among a core group of working‐class men. In the context of debates about whether the key causal factors are economic or cultural, we contend that an effective analysis must rest on understanding how economic and cultural developments interact to generate support for populism. We suggest that one way to do so is to see status anxiety as a proximate factor inducing support for populism, and economic and cultural developments as factors that combine to precipitate such anxiety. Using cross‐national survey data from 20 developed democracies, we assess the viability of this approach. We show that lower levels of subjective social status are associated with support for right populist parties, identify a set of economic and cultural developments likely to have depressed the social status of men without a college education, and show that the relative social status of those men has declined since 1987 in many of the developed democracies. We conclude that status effects provide one pathway through which economic and cultural developments may combine to increase support for the populist right.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,517
The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 · Cited by 5,059
(1978) · Cited by 5,009
Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe
Mudde, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511492037 · Cited by 4,694
The Rise of the Creative Class
Florida, R. L. (2002) · Cited by 4,537
The American Occupational Structure.
Blalock, H. M., Blau, P. M., Duncan, O. D., & Tyree, A. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092399 · Cited by 4,412
Pateman, C. (2015) · The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies · doi:10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss468 · Cited by 2,639
Müller, J.-W. (2016) · doi:10.9783/9780812293784 · Cited by 2,219
Populist radical Right parties in Europe
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-5219 · Cited by 1,594
Cited by
Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20170011 · Cited by 1,063
Ethno‐nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment
Bonikowski, B. (2017) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12325 · Cited by 644
Poland's Constitutional Breakdown
Sadurski, W. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.0001 · Cited by 588
American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective
Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108914123 · Cited by 481
Self-citationAddressing Recognition Gaps: Destigmatization and the Reduction of Inequality
Lamont, M. (2018) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122418773775 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S57-S84
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4446
- OpenAlex
- W2768147737
- Cited by
- 890
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 256.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-4446.12319
- The paper
- Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2017). The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.