The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The separateness of social and emotional loneliness in childhood
Abstract
Background: Much of the childhood loneliness research is misleading because it confounds objective and subjective measures of loneliness. The overall aim of this research was to examine the relationship between social isolation and emotional loneliness. Method: Three extreme groups were identified in a sample of 640 4–9‐year‐old children. There were two (`rejected' [ N =60] and `lonely' [ N =146]) in which social and emotional loneliness were unrelated. The first were socially isolated (rejected) but they did not feel lonely. The second group felt lonely but they were not socially isolated. The third group (`rejected/lonely') consisted of 61 children who were rejected and also felt lonely. Results: Felt loneliness and social rejection were experienced together by 61 children, but 206 children experienced either one or the other, but not both. The fourth and largest group [ N =374] were neither rejected nor lonely. Differences between the groups were found on direct observation measures of solitariness, sociability, and aggression; peer reports of shyness, aggression, prosocial behaviour, disruptive behaviour and inability to take teasing; self‐reports of self‐worth and competence, self‐reports of supportive relationships; and measures of language use. Conclusions: The results indicate that it is loneliness and not rejection that co‐occurs with emotional problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173
Developing a measure of loneliness
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11 · Cited by 2,089
Children's loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status.
Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.53.4.500 · Cited by 841
Depression and coping in stressful episodes
Coyne, J. C., Aldwin, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.90.5.439 · Cited by 539
Social and emotional loneliness: A re-examination of weiss' typology of loneliness
DiTommaso, E., & Spinner, B. (1997) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(96)00204-8 · Cited by 328
Relation between loneliness and depression: A structural equation analysis.
Weeks, D. G., Michela, J. L., Peplau, L. A., & Bragg, M. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077709 · Cited by 257
Cited by
The clinical significance of loneliness: a literature review
Heinrich, L. M., & Gullone, E. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002 · Cited by 1,986
Loneliness Across the Life Span
Qualter, P., Vanhalst, J., Harris, R., Van Roekel, E., Lodder, G., Bangee, M., Maes, M., & Verhagen, M. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615568999 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationChildhood loneliness as a predictor of adolescent depressive symptoms: an 8-year longitudinal study
Qualter, P., Brown, S. L., Munn, P., & Rotenberg, K. J. (2010) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-009-0059-y · Cited by 373
Self-citationTrajectories of loneliness during childhood and adolescence: Predictors and health outcomes
Qualter, P., Brown, S. L., Rotenberg, K. J., Vanhalst, J., Harris, R. A., Goossens, L., Bangee, M., & Munn, P. (2013) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.01.005 · Cited by 377
Self-citationLaursen, B., & Hartl, A. C. (2013) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.06.003 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Qualter, P., & Munn, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 233-244
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W1996562515
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The separateness of social and emotional loneliness in childhood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1469-7610.00016
- The paper
- Qualter, P., & Munn, P. (2002). The separateness of social and emotional loneliness in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.