Cited by 1,080Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionHealth disparities and outcomesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Loneliness Across the Life Span

Open access
Qualter, Pamela, Vanhalst, Janne, Harris, Rebecca, Van Roekel, Eeske, Lodder, Gerine, Bangee, Munirah, Maes, Marlies, Verhagen, Maaike·2015·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Most people have experienced loneliness and have been able to overcome it to reconnect with other people. In the current review, we provide a life-span perspective on one component of the evolutionary theory of loneliness—a component we refer to as the reaffiliation motive (RAM). The RAM represents the motivation to reconnect with others that is triggered by perceived social isolation. Loneliness is often a transient experience because the RAM leads to reconnection, but sometimes this motivation can fail, leading to prolonged loneliness. We review evidence of how aspects of the RAM change across development and how these aspects can fail for different reasons across the life span. We conclude with a discussion of age-appropriate interventions that may help to alleviate prolonged loneliness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691615568999

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qualter, P., Vanhalst, J., Harris, R., Van Roekel, E., Lodder, G., Bangee, M., Maes, M., & Verhagen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
  • Research Foundation - Flanders (BE)
  • Department of Education and Psychology, University of Bolton, United Kingdom
  • Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2015-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
250-264
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2158770352
Cited by
1,080
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 156 · 2025: 143 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2012: 1
FWCI
61.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
  • UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
loneliness, lifespan development, social isolation, social reconnection, age-appropriate interventions
MeSH terms
Aging, Humans, Human Development, Loneliness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review