Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: a 12‐year population‐based cohort study

Wikström Shemer, E, Marschall, HU, Ludvigsson, JF, Stephansson, O·2013·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective: To determine the risk for adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). Design: Population‐based cohort study. Setting: S wedish Medical Birth Register (MBR) 1997–2009. Population: A total of 1 213 668 singleton deliveries. Methods: Linkage of H ospital D ischarge R egister for exposure (ICP; n = 5477) with MBR for covariates. Main outcome measures: Gestational diabetes, pre‐eclampsia, prematurity, and stillbirth. Results: Intrahepatic cholestasis (ICP) was diagnosed in 0.32–0.58% of all pregnancies, with an increasing trend until 2005 (P < 0.0001). Compared with women who did not have ICP, women with ICP were more likely to have gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio, a OR, 2.81; 95% CI 2.32–3.41) and pre‐eclampsia (a OR 2.62, 95% CI 2.32–2.78). Women with ICP were also more likely to have spontaneous (a OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.47–1.93) and iatrogenic (a OR 5.95, 95% CI 5.23–6.60) preterm delivery, with increased rates of induction of labour (a OR 11.76, 95% CI 11.04–11.62). However, this actively managed cohort of ICP cases was not at increased risk of stillbirth (a OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52–1.62). Infants in ICP deliveries were more likely to have a low (<7) 5‐minute A pgar score (a OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.14–1.85) and be large for gestational age at birth (a OR 2.27, 95% CI 2.02–2.55). Conclusions: Over time, a greater proportion of S wedish pregnant women have received a diagnosis of ICP, probably because of an increased awareness of the disorder. Our data confirm an increased risk of preterm delivery, but not of stillbirth, in actively managed ICP. The high rates of gestational diabetes and pre‐eclampsia are new findings, and need to be considered in the management of ICP pregnancies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.12174

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Wikström Shemer, E., Marschall, H., Ludvigsson, J., & Stephansson, O.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-19
Volume
120
Issue
6
Pages
717-723
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1975161517
Cited by
299
References
5
FWCI
20.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: a 12‐year population‐based cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1471-0528.12174
The paper
Wikström Shemer, E., Marschall, H., Ludvigsson, J., & Stephansson, O. (2013). Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: a 12‐year population‐based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12174

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.