Cited by 80Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Mobility impairment is associated with urge but not stress urinary incontinence in community‐dwelling older women: results from the O ssébo study

Open access
Fritel, X, Lachal, L, Cassou, B, Fauconnier, A, Dargent‐Molina, P·2013·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective: To assess the association between functional limitations related to mobility and urinary incontinence ( UI ) in elderly women. Design: An observational cross‐sectional study. Setting: Nine ‘balance’ workshops in F rance. Population: A total of 1942 community‐dwelling women aged 75–85 years, who were invited, based on voter registration lists, to a ‘balance assessment’. Methods: Mobility and balance test results for incontinent women were compared with those for continent women according to the severity and type of incontinence. Main outcome measures: Data on UI were collected using a self‐administered questionnaire ( I nternational C onsultation on I ncontinence Q uestionnaire— S hort F orm). Motor‐related physical abilities were assessed using standardised balance and functional gait tests. Results: Forty‐two per cent of women had involuntary urine leakage, with daily leaks in 57% of them; 24% had stress UI , 31% had urge UI , and 37% had mixed UI . Results for each functional test were poorer for women with UI and the limitation was more pronounced when the incontinence was severe. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that balance and gait impairments were significantly and independently associated with urge UI (walking speed, lower versus higher quartile, odds ratio ( OR ) 2.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI ) 1.4–3.5; walking balance, unable versus able to do four tandem steps ( OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2–2.2) but not with stress UI . Conclusions: In this large population of older women living at home, there was a strong association between limitation of motor and balance skills and UI , which was proportional to the severity of incontinence and related specifically to urge incontinence. These results offer new perspectives on the prevention and treatment of urge incontinence in elderly women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.12316

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many older women with pelvic floor disorders, especially those with urinary and fecal incontinence, have limited mobility, which increases their dependence on caregivers to travel to providers' offices.

    “Many older women with pelvic floor disorders, especially those with urinary and fecal incontinence, also suffer from limited mobility, thus increasing their dependence on caregivers to travel to their providers’ office.13,14”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 4 Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A communitybased epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:1150 -7.
  2. 21 INSEE R ef erences. Les personnes ^ ag ees [Older people] Paris: Edition INSEE; 2005. [www.insee.fr/fr/ppp/sommaire/PERSAG05. PDF]. Accessed 18 December 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fritel, X., Lachal, L., Cassou, B., Fauconnier, A., & Dargent‐Molina, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR)
Corresponding author
Fritel, X
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-10
Volume
120
Issue
12
Pages
1566-1574
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2134537959
Cited by
80
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
French National Research Agency
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, mobility impairment, balance disorders, gait disturbance, older women, community-dwelling older adults, functional limitations, walking speed, tandem stance, incontinence severity
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Movement Disorders, Psychomotor Disorders, Quality of Life, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Walking, Urinary Incontinence, Urge, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review