Cited by 35Frailty in Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Shared Risk Factors for Falls, Incontinence, and Functional Dependence: Unifying the Approach to Geriatric Syndromes

Open access
Tinetti, Mary E.·1995·JAMA

Abstract

Objective. —To determine whether a set of factors representing impairments in multiple areas could be identified that predisposes to falling, incontinence, and functional dependence.\n\nDesign. —Population-based cohort with a 1-year follow-up.\n\nSetting. —General community.\n\nParticipants. —A total of 927 New Haven, Conn, residents, aged 72 years and older who completed the baseline and 1-year interviews.\n\nMain Outcome Measures. —At least one episode of urinary incontinence per week, at least two falls during the follow-up year, and dependence on human help for one or more basic activities of daily living.\n\nResults. —At 1 year, urinary incontinence was reported by 16%, at least two falls by 10%, and functional dependence by 20% of participants. The four independent predisposing factors for the outcomes of incontinence, falling, and functional dependence included slow timed chair stands (lower extremity impairment), decreased arm strength (upper extremity impairment), decreased vision and hearing (sensory impairment), and either a high anxiety or depression score (affective impairment). There was a significant increase in each of incontinence, falling, and functional dependence as the number of these predisposing factors increased. For example, the proportion of participants experiencing functional dependence doubled (7% to 14% to 28% to 60%) (X2=119.8; P<.001) as the number of predisposing factors increased from zero to one to two to at least three.\n\nConclusions. —Our findings suggest that predisposition to geriatric syndromes and functional dependence may result when impairments in multiple domains compromise compensatory ability. It may be possible to restore compensatory ability and prevent or delay the onset of several geriatric syndromes and, perhaps, functional dependence by modifying a shared set of predisposing factors. Perhaps it is time to take a more unified approach to the geriatric syndromes and functional dependence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1995.03520410042024

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tinetti, M. E.
Corresponding author
Tinetti, Mary E.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1995-05-03
Volume
273
Issue
17
Pages
1348
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W7214227318
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
falls, urinary incontinence, functional dependence, geriatric syndromes, shared risk factors, activities of daily living, lower extremity impairment, arm muscle strength, sensory impairment, anxiety, depression, older adults, compensatory abilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review