Cited by 194Maternal and fetal healthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsBlood transfusion and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: what do we know, and where do we go to next?

Weeks, A·2015·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a major cause of maternal deaths worldwide, and is estimated to cause the death of a woman every 10 minutes. This review presents the latest clinical advice, including new evidence on controlled cord traction, misoprostol, and oxytocin. The controversy around the diagnosis of PPH, the limitations of universal prophylaxis, and novel ways to provide obstetric first aid are also presented. It ends with a call to develop high‐quality front‐line obstetric services that can deal rapidly with unexpected haemorrhages as well as minimising blood loss at critical times: major abruption, placenta praevia, and caesarean for prolonged labour.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.13098

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH), 2006, Saving Mothers' Lives 2003‐2005
  2. World Health Organization, 2012, WHO Recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage
  3. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (NCCWCH), 2007, Intrapartum Care

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–194 of 194

Metadata

Authors
Weeks, A.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Weeks, A
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-07
Volume
122
Issue
2
Pages
202-210
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1984295142
Cited by
192
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Gynuity Health Projects (MamaMiso)
  • NIHR (II-LA-0712-20007)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood transfusion and management
Keywords
postpartum hemorrhage, maternal mortality, controlled cord traction, misoprostol, oxytocin, placental abruption, placenta previa, bleeding prevention
MeSH terms
Blood Transfusion, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Home Childbirth, Humans, Labor Stage, Third, Oxytocics, Pregnancy, Compression Bandages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review