The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Neurodevelopmental disorders are increasingly believed to originate from intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Current reviews exploring the neurodevelopmental effects of IUGR, however, are mostly based on birthweight, an inadequate proxy. Objective: We aimed to examine the association between IUGR documented in utero, and neurodevelopmental outcomes during childhood. Search strategy: Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Scopus were searched for relevant studies published after 1970. Selection criteria: The analysis included studies that identified IUGR in utero, with follow‐up assessments between 1 month and 12 years of age. Data collection and analysis: Data was extracted for cognitive, behavioural, language, motor, hearing, vision or sleep outcomes. Studies were summarised separately for children born at <35 and ≥35 weeks gestation. Main results: Of 28 876 titles identified, 38 were suitable for inclusion. IUGR children born ≥35 weeks gestation scored on average 0.5 SD lower than non‐IUGR children across all neurodevelopmental assessments. IUGR children born <35 weeks of gestation scored approximately 0.7 SD lower than non‐IUGR children across all neurodevelopmental assessments. IUGR children with evidence of fetal circulatory redistribution (preferential perfusion of the brain) had more severe neurodevelopmental impairments than those born IUGR alone. Conclusions: IUGR increases the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment during childhood differentially across domains. IUGR children born preterm or with evidence of fetal circulatory redistribution are more severely affected. Tweetable abstract: IUGR is associated with an overall risk for neurodevelopmental delay in a range of neurodevelopmental domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth
Goldenberg, R. L., Culhane, J. F., Iams, J. D., & Romero, R. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60074-4 · Cited by 7,801
Born too soon : the Global action report on preterm birth
Howson, C. P., Kinney, M., & Lawn, J. E. (2012) · Cited by 1,928
Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective.
Kopp, C. B. (1982) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.18.2.199 · Cited by 1,916
ALSPAC–The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
Golding, Pembrey, Jones, & The Alspac Study Team (2001) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00325.x · Cited by 1,549
Development of Executive Functions Through Late Childhood and Adolescence in an Australian Sample
Anderson, V. A., Anderson, P., Northam, E., Jacobs, R., & Catroppa, C. (2001) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2001_5 · Cited by 825
Barkley, R. A., Grodzinsky, G., & DuPaul, G. J. (1992) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00916547 · Cited by 724
Developmental changes in executive functioning.
Lee, K., Bull, R., & Ho, R. M. H. (2013) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12096 · Cited by 633
Brain damage induced by prenatal exposure to dexamethasone in fetal rhesus macaques. I. Hippocampus
Uno, H., Lohmiller, L., Thieme, C., Kemnitz, J. W., Engle, M. J., Roecker, E. B., & Farrell, P. M. (1990) · Developmental Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0165-3806(90)90002-g · Cited by 502
Tolsa, C. B., Zimine, S., Warfield, S. K., Freschi, M., Rossignol, A. S., Lazeyras, F., Hanquinet, S., Pfizenmaier, M., & Hüppi, P. S. (2004) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/01.pdr.0000128983.54614.7e · Cited by 484
Cited by
Lees, C. C., Stampalija, T., Baschat, A. A., da Silva Costa, F., Ferrazzi, E., Figueras, F., Hecher, K., Kingdom, J., Poon, L. C., Salomon, L. J., et al. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.22134 · Cited by 886
The Role of Nutrition in Brain Development: The Golden Opportunity of the “First 1000 Days”
Cusick, S. E., & Georgieff, M. K. (2016) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.05.013 · Cited by 710
Neonatal Morbidities of Fetal Growth Restriction: Pathophysiology and Impact
Malhotra, A., Allison, B. J., Castillo-Melendez, M., Jenkin, G., Polglase, G. R., & Miller, S. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2019.00055 · Cited by 453
Lee, A. C., Kozuki, N., Cousens, S., Stevens, G. A., Blencowe, H., Silveira, M. F., Sania, A., Rosen, H. E., Schmiegelow, C., Adair, L. S., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3677 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, E., Fernandes, M., Fazel, M., Kennedy, S., Villar, J., & Stein, A.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-19
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1062-1072
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1643783077
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1471-0528.13435
- The paper
- Murray, E., Fernandes, M., Fazel, M., Kennedy, S., Villar, J., & Stein, A. (2015). Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.