Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk factors and newborn outcomes associated with maternal deaths in the UK from 2009 to 2013: a national case–control study

Nair, M, Knight, M, Kurinczuk, JJ·2016·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the risk factors for and adverse newborn outcomes associated with maternal deaths from direct and indirect causes in the UK. Design: Unmatched case–control analysis. Setting: All hospitals caring for pregnant women in the UK. Population: Comprised 383 women who died (cases) from direct or indirect causes from 2009 to 2013 (Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths in the UK) and 1516 women who did not have any life‐threatening complications during pregnancy and childbirth (controls) obtained from UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). Methods: Multivariable regression analyses were undertaken to examine potential risk factors, their incremental effects, and adverse newborn outcomes associated with maternal deaths. Outcomes: Odds ratios associated for risk factors for maternal death and newborn outcomes (stillbirth, admission to neonatal intensive care unit [NICU], early neonatal death) and incremental risk. Results: Seven factors, of 13 examined, were independently associated with increased odds of maternal death: pre‐existing medical comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.65; 95% CI 6.29–11.90), anaemia during pregnancy (aOR 3.58; 95% CI 1.14–11.21), previous pregnancy problems (aOR 1.85; 95% CI 1.33–2.57), inadequate use of antenatal care (aOR 46.85; 95% CI 19.61–111.94), substance misuse (aOR 12.21; 95% CI 2.33–63.98), unemployment (aOR 1.81; 95% CI 1.08–3.04) and maternal age (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04–1.09). There was a four‐fold increase in the odds of death per unit increase in the number of risk factors. Odds of stillbirth, admission to NICU and early neonatal death were higher among women who died. Conclusion: This study reiterates the need for optimal care for women with medical comorbidities and older age, and the importance of adequate antenatal care. It demonstrates the existence of socio‐economic inequalities in maternal death in the UK. Tweetable abstract: Medical comorbidities and socio‐economic inequalities are important risk factors for maternal death in the UK.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.13978

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029077 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/1471-0528.13279 · DOI
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2008, Antenatal Care [CG62]
  4. 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S1-S4 · DOI
  5. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001409 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S1-S7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.010 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/1471-0528.12633 · DOI
  9. Manktelow BM, 2015, Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2013
  10. 10.1111/1471-0528.12820 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00609.x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.03.002 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/sj.jp.7211810 · DOI
  14. 10.2471/BLT.08.057828 · DOI
  15. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318233042d · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pone.0095086 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d9f629 · DOI
  18. Office for National Statistics, 2003, Ethnic Group Statistics: A Guide for the Collection and Classification of Ethnicity Data
  19. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002742 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1089 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1186/1742-4755-2-9 · DOI
  23. 10.1056/NEJM198703123161105 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.011 · DOI
  25. 10.2105/AJPH.93.4.631 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03239.x · DOI
  27. Kavle JA, 2008, Association between anaemia during pregnancy and blood loss at and after delivery among women with vaginal births in Pemba Island, Zanzibar, Tanzania, J Health Popul Nutr, 26, 232
  28. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.041 · DOI
  29. 10.1503/cmaj.045156 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.012 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000172428.78411.b0 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10093.x · DOI
  33. 10.1159/000080354 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.016 · DOI
  35. 10.1186/1471-2393-13-93 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Nair, M., Knight, M., & Kurinczuk, J.
Affiliations
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Nuffield Department of Population Health University of Oxford Oxford UK
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-10
Volume
123
Issue
10
Pages
1654-1662
ISSN
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
Cited by
50
References
4
Language
en
Funders
National Institute for Health Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.