Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 552

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control studyCommentary: Obstetric morbidity data and the need to evaluate thromboembolic disease

Waterstone, Mark, Murphy, J Deirdre, Bewley, Susan, Wolfe, Charles·2001·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity. Design: Development of definitions of severe obstetric morbidity by literature review. Case-control study from a defined delivery population with four randomly selected pregnant women as controls for every case. Setting: All 19 maternity units within the South East Thames region and six neighbouring hospitals caring for pregnant women from the region between 1 March 1997 and 28 February 1998. Participants: 48 865 women who delivered during the time frame. Results: There were 588 cases of severe obstetric morbidity giving an incidence of 12.0/1000 deliveries (95% confidence interval 11.2 to 13.2). During the study there were five maternal deaths attributed to conditions studied. Disease specific morbidities per 1000 deliveries were 6.7 (6.0 to 7.5) for severe haemorrhage, 3.9 (3.3 to 4.5) for severe pre-eclampsia, 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) for eclampsia, 0.5 (0.3 to 0.8) for HELLP (Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelets) syndrome, 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) for severe sepsis, and 0.2 (0.1 to 0.4) for uterine rupture. Age over 34 years, non-white ethnic group, past or current hypertension, previous postpartum haemorrhage, delivery by emergency caesarean section, antenatal admission to hospital, multiple pregnancy, social exclusion, and taking iron or anti-depressants at antenatal booking were all independently associated with morbidity after adjustment. Conclusion: Severe obstetric morbidity and its relation to mortality may be more sensitive measures of pregnancy outcome than mortality alone. Most events are related to obstetric haemorrhage and severe pre-eclampsia. Caesarean section quadruples the risk of morbidity. Development and evaluation of ways of predicting and reducing risk are required with particular emphasis paid on the management of haemorrhage and pre-eclampsia. What is already known on this topic: Maternal mortality is used internationally as a measure of the quality of obstetric intervention, although it is now rare in the developed world Hospital based series estimating the incidence of severe obstetric morbidity have used different definitions Estimated incidence of severe obstetric morbidity ranges from 0.05 to 1.09 What this study adds: With clear definitions and population based estimates of some severe obstetric morbidities this study estimated the overall incidence of severe obstetric morbidity as 1.2 % of deliveries Two thirds of the cases are related to severe haemorrhage, one third to hypertensive disorders Risk factors for severe maternal morbidity include maternal age >34, social exclusion, non-white, hypertension, previous postpartum haemorrhage, induction of labour, and caesarean section

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1089

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Stones, 1991, An investigation of maternal morbidity with identification of life-threatening ‘near miss’ episodes, Health Trends, 23, 13
  2. Fitzpatrick, 1992, Near miss maternal mortality (letter), Irish Med J, 85, 37
  3. Mantel, 1998, Severe acute maternal morbidity: a pilot study of a definition for a near-miss, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 105, 985, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10262.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0028-2243(95)02317-L · DOI
  5. Bewley, 1997, ‘Near miss’ obstetric enquiry, J Obstet Gynaecol, 17, 26
  6. 10.1378/chest.103.5.1548 · DOI
  7. Johannson, 1995, Obstetric intensive care at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, J Obstet Gynaecol, 15, 174, 10.3109/01443619509015490 · DOI
  8. Mabie, 1990, Treatment in an obstetric intensive care unit, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 162, 1, 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90808-K · DOI
  9. 10.1177/004947559702700406 · DOI
  10. Lapinsky, 1997, Critical care management of the obstetric patient, Can J Anaesth, 44, 325, 10.1007/BF03015374 · DOI
  11. 10.1378/chest.101.5.1407 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/00007611-199304000-00008 · DOI
  13. Ng, 1992, Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit—a retrospective review, Ann Acad Med Singapore, 21, 804
  14. Umo-Etuk, 1996, Critically ill parturient women and admission to intensive care: a 5 year review, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 5, 79
  15. 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91123-T · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90043-I · DOI
  17. 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 · DOI
  18. 10.1378/chest.101.6.1481 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10874.x · DOI
  20. Tan, 1994, Pregnancy and delivery in primigravidae aged 35 and over, Singapore Med J, 35, 495
  21. Roberts, 1994, Delayed childbearing—are there any risks?, Med J Aust, 160, 539, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb138342.x · DOI
  22. Peipert, 1993, Maternal age: an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery, Obstet Gynecol, 81, 200
  23. Jonas, 1992, The association of maternal and socioeconomic characteristics in metropolitan Adelaide with medical, obstetric and labour complications and pregnancy outcomes, Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol, 32, 1, 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1992.tb01885.x · DOI
  24. Jonas, 1991, Pregnancy outcomes in primigravid women aged 35 years and over in South Australia, 1986–1988, Med J Aust, 154, 246, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1991.tb121082.x · DOI
  25. Tuck, 1988, Pregnancy outcome in elderly primigravidae with and without a history of infertility, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 95, 230, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06862.x · DOI
  26. Lehmann, 1987, Pregnancy outcome in medically complicated and uncomplicated patients aged 40 years or older, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 157, 738, 10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80041-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.531 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70455-1 · DOI
  29. Klonoff-Cohen, 1993, Cigarette smoking and preeclampsia, Obstet Gynecol, 81, 541
  30. Fitzpatrick, 1992, Near miss maternal mortality (letter), Irish Med J, 85, 37
  31. Drife, 1993, Maternal “near-miss' reports?, BMJ, 307, 1087, 10.1136/bmj.307.6912.1087 · DOI
  32. Tuffnell, 2000, Amniotic fluid embolism: the UK register, Hosp Med, 61, 532, 10.12968/hosp.2000.61.8.1394 · DOI
  33. Campbell, 1999, Review and assessment of selection criteria used when booking pregnant women at different places of birth, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 106, 550, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08323.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 552

Metadata

Authors
Waterstone, M., Murphy, J. D., Bewley, S., & Wolfe, C.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-05-05
Volume
322
Issue
7294
Pages
1089-1094
ISSN
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
Cited by
552
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control studyCommentary: Obstetric morbidity data and the need to evaluate thromboembolic disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1089
The paper
Waterstone, M., Murphy, J. D., Bewley, S., & Wolfe, C. (2001). Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control studyCommentary: Obstetric morbidity data and the need to evaluate thromboembolic disease. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1089

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.