Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Open access
Shakibazadeh, E, Namadian, M, Bohren, MA, Vogel, JP, Rashidian, A, Nogueira Pileggi, V, Madeira, S, Leathersich, S, Tunçalp, Ӧ, Oladapo, OT, Souza, JP, Gülmezoglu, AM·2018·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Background: What constitutes respectful maternity care (RMC) operationally in research and programme implementation is often variable. Objectives: To develop a conceptualisation of RMC. Search strategy: Key databases, including PubMed,CINAHL,EMBASE, Global Health Library, grey literature, and reference lists of relevant studies. Selection criteria: Primary qualitative studies focusing on care occurring during labour, childbirth, and/or immediately postpartum in health facilities, without any restrictions on locations or publication date. Data collection and analysis: A combined inductive and deductive approach was used to synthesise the data; the GRADE CERQ ual approach was used to assess the level of confidence in review findings. Main results: Sixty‐seven studies from 32 countries met our inclusion criteria. Twelve domains of RMC were synthesised: being free from harm and mistreatment; maintaining privacy and confidentiality; preserving women's dignity; prospective provision of information and seeking of informed consent; ensuring continuous access to family and community support; enhancing quality of physical environment and resources; providing equitable maternity care; engaging with effective communication; respecting women's choices that strengthen their capabilities to give birth; availability of competent and motivated human resources; provision of efficient and effective care; and continuity of care. Globally, women's perspectives of what constitutes RMC are quite consistent. Conclusions: This review presents an evidence‐based typology of RMC in health facilities globally, and demonstrates that the concept is broader than a reduction of disrespectful care or mistreatment of women during childbirth. Innovative approaches should be developed and tested to integrate RMC as a routine component of quality maternal and newborn care programmes. Tweetable abstract: Understanding respectful maternity care – synthesis of evidence from 67 qualitative studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.15015

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Shakibazadeh, E., Namadian, M., Bohren, M., Vogel, J., Rashidian, A., Nogueira Pileggi, V, Madeira, S., Leathersich, S., Tunçalp, Ӧ., Oladapo, O., Souza, J., & Gülmezoglu, A.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-08
Volume
125
Issue
8
Pages
932-942
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2767456678
Cited by
461
References
13
FWCI
27.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1471-0528.15015
The paper
Shakibazadeh, E., Namadian, M., Bohren, M., Vogel, J., Rashidian, A., Nogueira Pileggi, V, Madeira, S., Leathersich, S., Tunçalp, Ӧ., Oladapo, O., Souza, J., & Gülmezoglu, A. (2018). Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.