Cited by 878Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsDelphi Technique in Research

Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)

Open access
Lewin, Simon, Glenton, Claire, Munthe-Kaas, Heather, Carlsen, Benedicte, Colvin, Christopher J., Gülmezoglu, Metin, Noyes, Jane, Booth, Andrew +2 more·2015·PLOS Medicine

Abstract

Simon Lewin and colleagues present a methodology for increasing transparency and confidence in qualitative research synthesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Downgrades in confidence were primarily driven by methodological limitations related to limited reporting of researcher positioning and reflexivity across contributing studies, and depending on the finding, by context-dependence (relevance) or uneven richness of supporting data (adequacy).

    “Downgrades were primarily driven by methodological limitations related to limited reporting of researcher positioning and reflexivity across contributing studies, and depending on the finding, by context-dependence (relevance) or uneven richness of supporting data (adequacy) (Lewin et al., 2015).”

    From Relational and Institutional Disenfranchisement in Suicide Bereavement: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Family Members' Experiences (2026) · cites this paper as Lewin et al., 2015

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GRADE-CERQual was used to assess confidence in the evidence informing each individual review finding, with ratings of high, moderate, or low confidence.

    “The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) approach [37] was used to assess the confidence that can be attributed to the evidence informing each individual review finding, with ratings of high, moderate, or low confidence being attributed to each finding.”
  • Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach.

    “Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach.”
  • Confidence in the evidence was assessed using GRADE-CERQual and ranged from high to moderate.

    “Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual [37] tool and ranged from high to moderate (Multimedia Appendix 7 [9,14-16,44-52]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]WHO (2012) Optimizing health worker roles to improve access to key maternal and newborn health interventions through task shifting Geneva: World Health Organization. 23844452

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewin, S., Glenton, C., Munthe-Kaas, H., Carlsen, B., Colvin, C. J., Gülmezoglu, M., Noyes, J., Booth, A., Garside, R., & Rashidian, A.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten (NO)
  • Uni Research (Norway) (NO)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • World Bank (US)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (EG)
Corresponding author
Lewin, Simon
Venue
PLOS Medicine
Published
2015-10-27
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
e1001895
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2107819237
Cited by
866
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
63.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA) (University of Bergen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
qualitative evidence synthesis, GRADE-CERQual, decision-making, transparency, research evidence appraisal
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Public Policy, Research Design, Qualitative Research, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review