Cited by 162

Effectiveness of a Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Program for Incarcerated Female Juvenile Offenders

Trupin, Eric W., Stewart, David G., Beach, Brad, Boesky, Lisa·2002·Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Female offenders incarcerated in Washington State have demonstrated higher rates of mental health needs than boys. Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) is an effective treatment for adult women with Borderline Personality Disorder. DBT utilises a combination of skills training, problem solving, and validation to enable patients to reduce self‐destructive, impulsive and aggressive behaviours. The prevalence of similar emotional problems among female juvenile offenders suggests that DBT may be an effective strategy for this population. The State of Washington Governor's Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee sponsored a collaborative project conducted by a research team from the University of Washington and the staff at the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration's Echo Glen Children's Center to evaluate the effectiveness of a DBT intervention. Method: Pre‐post intervention records were compared for female offenders from a mental health and a general population unit where DBT was implemented. Youth on a third unit served as a comparison group. Youth behaviour problems, staff punitive responses were compared before and after the intervention period. Results: Youth behaviour problems and use of punitive responses by staff decreased compared to the year prior on one cottage (unit) while no behaviour or staff changes were noted on another. Conclusions: The evaluation demonstrated the efficacy of providing DBT to female offenders in a residential setting and yielded mixed results on behaviour change during the study period that may relate to quality of training and prior youth behaviour problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1475-3588.00022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBT is a promising intervention for juvenile offenders.

    “Additionally, DBT is a promising intervention for juvenile offenders (Trupin, Stewart, Beach, & Boesky, 2002).”

    From Transdiagnostic applications of DBT for adolescents and adults (2015) · cites this paper as Trupin, Stewart, Beach, & Boesky, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trupin, E. W., Stewart, D. G., Beach, B., & Boesky, L.
Venue
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08-06
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
121-127
ISSN
  • 1475-357X
  • 1475-3588
Cited by
162
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review