The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strength, Toughness and Thermal Shock Resistance of Ancient Ceramics, and Their Influence On Technological Choice
Abstract
The basic underlying theory for the strength, toughness and thermal shock resistance of brittle multiphase clay ceramics, together with the measurement procedures to determine these parameters, are first outlined. Published experimental data obtained for test bars containing different types of temper and fired to a range of temperatures are then compared both with theoretical predictions and between themselves. The results confirm that to produce pottery with high strength requires high firing temperatures and low temper concentrations. Conversely, to produce pottery with high toughness and thermal shock resistance requires low firing temperatures and high temper concentrations, with platy or fibrous temper being most effective. There is no convincing published evidence that strength and toughness requirements were a significant factor in determining the technological choices (clay type, temper type and concentration, and firing temperature) in the production of pottery used as containers for transport and storage. In contrast, the routine use of high temper concentrations and low firing temperatures in the production of cooking pots suggests that the requirement for high thermal shock resistance was a factor that at least influenced technological choice in this case. In addition, there is some evidence that limestone and shell were, on occasions, deliberately chosen as temper in cooking pots. The need to take into account the crucial role that the full range of environmental, technological, economic, social, political and ideological factors have in influencing technological choice is also emphasized. This review highlights the fact that our current understanding of the factors determining strength, toughness and thermal shock resistance of clay ceramics is still far from complete. Further systematic measurements of these parameters, together with the establishment of a systematic database of the range of technological choices associated with the production of cooking pots, are therefore to be encouraged.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The addition of quartz improves refractory properties and reduces volumetric change in clays due to thermal effect.
“Their addition improves refractory properties and reduces volumetric change in clays due to the thermal effect [49, 50].”
From Reverse engineering of ceramic anthropomorphic figurines from the tumaco archaeological tradition in southwest Colombia (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emergence and Diversification of the Neolithic in Southern Vietnam: Insights From Coastal Rach Nui
Oxenham, M. F., Piper, P. J., Bellwood, P., Bui, C. H., Nguyen, K. T. K., Nguyen, Q. M., Campos, F., Castillo, C., Wood, R., Sarjeant, C., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology · doi:10.1080/15564894.2014.980473 · Cited by 77
Pezzarossi, G. (2015) · Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12760-6_15 · Cited by 9
Bustamante, N. A., Escobar, J. A., & Martinón-Torres, M. (2021) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250230 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Tite, M. S., Kilikoglou, V., & Vekinis, G.
- Venue
- Archaeometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-324
- ISSN
- 0003-813X
- 1475-4754
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review