Cited by 3Cultural Heritage Materials AnalysisAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryArchaeological and Geological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 52 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Reverse engineering of ceramic anthropomorphic figurines from the Tumaco archaeological tradition in southwest Colombia

Open access
Bustamante, Nohora Alba, Escobar, Jairo Arturo, Martinón-Torres, Marcos·2021·PLOS One

Abstract

Traditional studies of archaeological ceramics in Colombia have been largely based on visual and stylistic analyses. Here we introduce frameworks and concepts of reverse engineering as a complementary strategy to develop hypotheses about ceramic manufacture, as a first step to the address possible cross-craft relationships and broader sociocultural parameters affecting technical traditions. Our case study is focused on ceramic figurines recovered from two archaeological sites in southwest Colombia (Inguapí and La Cocotera), both dated to the period of greatest cultural and technological development of the Tumaco tradition (350 BC–AD 350). The results of the analyses including microscopy, XRF, SEM-EDS and XRD revealed two manufacturing pathways within the broader tradition, developed locally and adapted to the natural resources available to each site. These are shown through chemical and mineralogical differences in the raw materials, as well as differences in their preparation and shaping, molding, and modeling processes as observed at the microstructural level. Estimated firing temperatures are under 600°C for La Cocotera, and under 800°C for those of Inguapí, with an inhomogeneous, oxidizing atmosphere probably related to firing in a pit. The superficial characterization shows that all the figurines were painted, with those from Inguapí externally smoothed and polished, and those from La Cocotera covered with a slip. Notwithstanding differences between sites, the ceramic figurines illustrate a particular technical style that undoubtedly conveyed a shared ideological message of cultural affiliation. These results contribute in an innovative way to archaeological ceramic studies in Colombia from a different perspective that is complementary to the more common typological studies.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Reverse engineering of ceramic anthropomorphic figurine fragments from Inguapí and La Cocotera in the Tumaco tradition (350 BC–AD 350) identified two distinct local manufacturing pathways. The pathways differ in raw materials, shaping, firing temperature, and finishing despite a shared stylistic and ideological tradition.

Key findings

  • Raw materials differed by site: Inguapí fragments had higher SiO₂ (55–60%) and Al₂O₃ (21–26%), while La Cocotera fragments had lower SiO₂ (46–52%) and Al₂O₃ (15–19%), higher alkali/alkaline earth oxides, higher Fe₂O₃ (21–28% vs. 13–17%), and higher TiO₂ (average 4.1% vs. 1.2%). Mineralogically, Inguapí samples contained illite, kaolinite, albite, hornblende, and quartz; La Cocotera samples contained montmorillonite, kaolinite, plagioclase, hornblende, muscovite, quartz, and anatase.
  • Shaping differed: Inguapí figurines were shaped by modeling, with direct modeling traces, incisions, and appliqué decoration; La Cocotera figurines were shaped by molding, with concave geometry, finger impressions, and a mold (CO06/CO07) matching fragment CO08.
  • Firing temperatures were estimated below 600°C for La Cocotera and below 800°C for Inguapí; specific estimates include IN03 at 699–739°C and CO09 at 540–586°C. All samples showed an inhomogeneous, oxidizing atmosphere, no vitrification, and dark cores consistent with open/pit firing.
  • Finishing differed: all figurines were painted, but Inguapí pieces were externally smoothed and polished, while La Cocotera pieces were covered with a slip.

Methods

  • The study applied a reverse engineering framework with six methodological stages, using a powder technology model with four manufacturing stages: raw material, shaping, thermal treatment, and finishing.
  • Nine ceramic figurine fragments were analyzed: IN01–IN05 from Inguapí (Bouchard project, 1977–78) and CO06–CO09 from La Cocotera (Patiño project, 1986–1988), all from the Tumaco tradition’s second phase (350 BC–AD 350), mangrove physiographic zone, and midden/domestic/ceremonial/funerary contexts.
  • Analyses included XRF for bulk chemistry, XRD for mineralogy and firing-temperature estimates, petrographic thin-section microscopy, SEM-EDS for microstructure and inclusions, and macro/micro surface examination for shaping and finishing traces.

Limitations

  • The paper states that further studies should validate the proposed manufacturing hypotheses and expand the range of sites, ceramic types, and possible cross-craft interactions. It also notes that technological information on Colombian archaeological ceramics is limited and non-existent for the tradition under study, restricting comparison.
  • Evident from the text: the sample is small—nine fragments from two sites—so the two-pathway interpretation is site-specific and not necessarily representative of the broader Tumaco tradition.
  • Evident from the text: firing temperatures are estimated from XRD phase transformations and experimental comparisons rather than direct kiln or firing-structure evidence, and the manufacturing hypotheses are proposed for future validation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0250230

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 of 52 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    The analyses including microscopy, XRF, SEM-EDS and XRD revealed two manufacturing pathways within the broader Tumaco tradition.

    “The results of the analyses including microscopy, XRF, SEM-EDS and XRD revealed two manufacturing pathways within the broader tradition, developed locally and adapted to the natural resources available to each site.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    All the figurines were painted.

    “The superficial characterization shows that all the figurines were painted, with those from Inguapí externally smoothed and polished, and those from La Cocotera covered with a slip.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Estimated firing temperatures for Inguapí figurines are under 800°C.

    “Estimated firing temperatures are under 600°C for La Cocotera, and under 800°C for those of Inguapí, with an inhomogeneous, oxidizing atmosphere probably related to firing in a pit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    La Cocotera figurines were covered with a slip.

    “The superficial characterization shows that all the figurines were painted, with those from Inguapí externally smoothed and polished, and those from La Cocotera covered with a slip.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Estimated firing temperatures for La Cocotera figurines are under 600°C.

    “Estimated firing temperatures are under 600°C for La Cocotera, and under 800°C for those of Inguapí, with an inhomogeneous, oxidizing atmosphere probably related to firing in a pit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 40
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Charcoal samples from Inguapí strata yielded dates Ny639: 2220 ± 85BP (431-41 calBC at 94.9% probability) and Ny640: 2000 ± 80BP (203 calBC-241 calAD at 95.4% probability).

    “Charcoal samples from these strata yielded the following dates: Ny639: 2220 ± 85BP (431–41 calBC at 94.9% probability) and Ny640: 2000 ± 80BP (203 calBC– 241 calAD at 95.4% probability) (both dates calibrated with OxCal v.4.3.2, IntCal 13) [10, 25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10] JF Bouchard, 1983, Excavaciones arqueológicas en la región de Tumaco., Revista Colombiana de Antropología source

      The “DATACIONES 14-C > 1) Región de Tumaco” table lists Ny 639 and Ny 640 at Inguapí with the claimed 2220 ± 85 BP and 2000 ± 80 BP dates. It does not report the calibrated calendar ranges or probabilities; those appear to be calculations supplied by the citing authors, not dates stated in this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [25] J-F Bouchard, 1977, Investigaciones arqueológicas en la Costa Pacífica Meridional de Colombia. El proyecto Tumaco, Revista Colombiana de Antropología source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The two manufacturing pathways are shown through chemical and mineralogical differences in the raw materials, as well as differences in preparation and shaping, molding, and modeling processes observed at the microstructural level.

    “These are shown through chemical and mineralogical differences in the raw materials, as well as differences in their preparation and shaping, molding, and modeling processes as observed at the microstructural level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The firing atmosphere was inhomogeneous and oxidizing.

    “Estimated firing temperatures are under 600°C for La Cocotera, and under 800°C for those of Inguapí, with an inhomogeneous, oxidizing atmosphere probably related to firing in a pit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    La Cocotera ceramic samples contained montmorillonite and kaolinite clay minerals, along with plagioclase, amphiboles (hornblende), mica (muscovite), quartz and anatase.

    “In the second group, which comprised La Cocotera ceramic samples, montmorillonite and kaolinite clay minerals were detected, along with plagioclase, amphiboles (hornblende), mica (muscovite), quartz and anatase (Fig 5B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Pores in the IN group were fine-sized and presented vesicular shapes, while for the CO group these were planar and/or vough shaped and showed a greater length.

    “Regarding pore shape the pores in the IN group where fine-sized and presented vesicular shapes (Fig 6, IN), while for the CO group these were planar and/or vough shaped and showed a greater length (Fig 6, CO).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In Inguapí potsherds, the fine inclusions fraction (20-140 microns) represented an average of 90% of the section, while in sherds from La Cocotera the fine fraction was less than 60%.

    “In Inguapí (IN) potsherds, the fine inclusions fraction (determined between 20 and 140 microns) represented an average of 90% of the section, while in sherds from La Cocotera [CO], the fine fraction was less than 60%, Table 6 lists the quantitative characterization of aplastic inclusions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The main differences in the thin sections were the size of inclusions, pores shape and type of some inclusions.

    “The main differences in the thin sections were the size of inclusions, pores shape and type of some inclusions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    At the macrostructural level, paint remains and the use of slip were identified.

    “At the microstructural level, smoothing patterns were observed which indicated mechanical of abrasion or polishing; at the macrostructural level, paint remains, and the use of slip were identified.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Fig 12B shows the microstructure of IN01 under higher magnification, where individual clay minerals and the lack of vitrification can be noticed.

    “Fig 12A shows a cross-section of IN01, displaying a dark core coloration with bright exterior surfaces; Fig 12B shows the microstructure this same sherd under higher magnification, where individual clay minerals and the lack of vitrification can be noticed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Samples CO8 and CO09 show a smooth and regular surface, but such linear patterns were not observed.

    “Although samples CO8 and CO09 show a smooth and regular surface, such linear patterns were not observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    Fig 12A shows a cross-section of IN01, displaying a dark core coloration with bright exterior surfaces.

    “Fig 12A shows a cross-section of IN01, displaying a dark core coloration with bright exterior surfaces; Fig 12B shows the microstructure this same sherd under higher magnification, where individual clay minerals and the lack of vitrification can be noticed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Applied decoration is observed in the bracelet in IN02 and the eyes in IN04.

    “In addition, applied decoration is observed in the bracelet in IN02 and the eyes in IN04 (see Fig 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Uniformity or differences were observed in the surface coloration and the sample cross section.

    “Uniformity or differences were observed in the surface coloration and the sample cross section.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Iron oxide levels are high in both sites, but especially so at La Cocotera (21-28% Fe2O3, compared to 13-17% at Inguapí).

    “Iron oxide levels are high in both sites, but especially so at La Cocotera (21–28% Fe2O3, compared to 13–17% at Inguapí), where they are also matched by remarkably high titania (average 4.1% compared to 1.2% at Inguapí).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The Tumaco archaeological tradition extended about 500 kilometers along the Pacific coast, from Buenaventura in Colombia to Atacames in Ecuador.

    “This tradition reveals valuable information on the human use of tropical jungle environments since it geographically extended for about 500 kilometers along the Pacific coast, from Buenaventura in Colombia to Atacames in Ecuador [1].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] DA Scott, 2011, La Tolita-Tumaco Culture: Master metalsmiths in gold and platinum, Latin American Antiquity source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The second phase of the Tumaco tradition lasted from 350 BC to 350 AD and is considered a climax of social and technological complexity.

    “This phase lasted from 350 BC to 350 AD and, it is considered a climax of social and technological complexity of this tradition [5–7, 10, 11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [5] F Valdez, 1987
    • cites [6] D Patiño, 1992, Sociedades Tumaco-La Tolita: Costa Pacífica de Colombia y Ecuador, Boletín de Arqueología Fundación de Investigaciones Arqueológicas
    • cites [7] D Patiño, 2003
    • cites [10] JF Bouchard, 1983, Excavaciones arqueológicas en la región de Tumaco., Revista Colombiana de Antropología source
    • cites [11] H Salgado, 1995, Alfarería Prehispánica Temprana [I Milenio A.C.] entre la bahía de Buenventura y el bajo Río San Juan Pacífico Colombiano, Boletín de Arqueología de la Fundación de Investigaciones Arqueológicas Nacionales
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Nearly 4500 figurines have been described in detail focusing on stylistic and iconographic examination.

    “The previously mentioned characteristics have been complemented with detailed descriptions of nearly 4500 figurines, focusing on stylistic and iconographic examination [9, 17–20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [9] MF Ugalde, 2009
    • cites [17] C Di Capua, 1994, Valdivia Figurines and Puberty Rituals: An Hypothesis, Andean Past 4
    • cites [18] E Ferdon, 1940, Reconnaissance in Esmeraldas [primera parte], El Palacio. XLVII [12]
    • cites [19] Á Ramírez, 2006, El concepto de estilo en Arqueología: Análisis estilístico de figurinas antropomorfas Tumaco-La Tolita, un estudio de caso. Museo Arqueológico Casa del Marqués de San Jorge., Inversa
    • cites [20] E Sánchez, 1981
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    A considerable number of figurine fragments recovered during the second phase were found predominantly in domestic and residential contexts, and also in middens, funerary, and ceremonial contexts.

    “A considerable number of figurine fragments recovered during this phase, found predominately in domestic and residential contexts, was also found in the context of middens, funerary, and ceremonial contexts [7, 10, 12–15].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [7] D Patiño, 2003
    • cites [10] JF Bouchard, 1983, Excavaciones arqueológicas en la región de Tumaco., Revista Colombiana de Antropología source
    • cites [12] J Cubillos, 1955
    • cites [13] Patiño D. Asentamientos prehispánicos en la Costa Pacífica Caucana. Banco de la República FIAN, editor. Bogotá1988.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [14] H Salgado, 1993, Metalurgia Prehispánica y colonial-Republicana en el Pacífico Colombiano, Revista Colombiana de Antropología
    • cites [15] H Salgado, 1995
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Researchers' hypotheses about the meaning and use of the figurines are limited by lack of written sources, inconsistencies in time frame and cultural codes, and absence of archaeological contexts for most figurines.

    “However, they are limited by the lack of written sources, inconsistencies in both the time frame and the cultural codes, and particularly the absence of archeological contexts for most of the figurines related to this tradition [9, 13, 15, 17–21].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [9] MF Ugalde, 2009
    • cites [13] Patiño D. Asentamientos prehispánicos en la Costa Pacífica Caucana. Banco de la República FIAN, editor. Bogotá1988.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [15] H Salgado, 1995
    • cites [17] C Di Capua, 1994, Valdivia Figurines and Puberty Rituals: An Hypothesis, Andean Past 4
    • cites [18] E Ferdon, 1940, Reconnaissance in Esmeraldas [primera parte], El Palacio. XLVII [12]
    • cites [19] Á Ramírez, 2006, El concepto de estilo en Arqueología: Análisis estilístico de figurinas antropomorfas Tumaco-La Tolita, un estudio de caso. Museo Arqueológico Casa del Marqués de San Jorge., Inversa
    • cites [20] E Sánchez, 1981
    • cites [21] K Stothert, 2003
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Our results identified clear and consistent differences in the manufacturing processes leading to the same type of representation (ceramic figurines), which indicate distinct technological choices at each of the two sites analysed.

    “Our results identified clear and consistent differences in the manufacturing processes leading to the same type of representation (ceramic figurines), which indicate distinct technological choices at each of the two sites analysed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The analyzed fragments are representative of the original ceramic figurines and their manufacturing processes.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given

    The presence of clay pellets could be the result of a lack of mixing or incomplete kneading of the ceramic paste.

    “The presence of this material could be the result of a lack of mixing or incomplete kneading of the ceramic paste.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Tumaco ceramic figurines illustrate a culturally cohesive tradition through a characteristic style in which the figurines show a naturalistic expression and anatomy, and motifs that are repeated with the same characteristics, produced by different artists who apparently did not have much creative freedom.

    “In particular, Tumaco ceramic figurines illustrate a culturally cohesive tradition through a characteristic “style” in which the figurines show a naturalistic expression and anatomy, and motifs that are repeated with the same characteristics, produced by different artists who apparently do not appear to have had much creative freedom [9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] MF Ugalde, 2009
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The formulation of manufacturing hypotheses was based on the powder technology model, which includes four processing stages: obtaining and preparing raw material, shaping or geometry, thermal treatment, and finishing.

    “The formulation of hypothesis was based on the powder technology model, which is currently the most common method of manufacturing ceramic artefacts as well as some metals (powder metallurgy), and which includes four processing stages: 1) obtaining and preparing the raw material, 2) shaping or geometry, 3) thermal treatment and 4)finishing [40].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] R German, 2005
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductnone given

    SEM-EDS results are averages of measurements with a 95% confidence interval.

    “The conditions used for the analysis are listed in Table 3 and the results are average of measurements with a 95% confidence interval.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    Selected samples were recovered from the same physiographic zone and the same contexts.

    “environmentally, all the samples were recovered from the same physiographic zone (mangrove, interfluvial, floodplain or fluvial plain) and the same contexts: middens, habitation sites, ceremonial centers, and/or funerary contexts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The use of reverse engineering as a methodological tool allowed the materials characterization of the Tumaco ceramic figurine fragments, and the formulation of hypotheses regarding their manufacture.

    “The use of reverse engineering as a methodological tool allowed the materials characterization of the Tumaco ceramic figurine fragments, and the formulation of hypotheses regarding their manufacture.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The presence and chemical composition of volcanic glasses are consistent with the volcanism of the Andean zone between Colombia and Ecuador.

    “Their presence and chemical composition are consistent with the volcanism of the Andean zone between Colombia and Ecuador [51].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] J Galvis, 1992, Vulcanismo Terciario al Sur de la Isla de Mompox [Parte Nororiental de la Serranía de San Lucas], Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The addition of quartz improves refractory properties and reduces volumetric change in clays due to thermal effect.

    “Their addition improves refractory properties and reduces volumetric change in clays due to the thermal effect [49, 50].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] MS Tite, 2001, Strength, Toughness and Thermal Shock Resistance of Ancient Ceramics, and Their Influence On Technological Choice, Archaeometry source
    • cites [50] V Kilikoglou, 1998, Mechanical performance of Quartz-tempered ceramics: Part I, strength and toughness, Archaeometry source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The microstructural and macrostructural evidences suggest all the ceramic objects here examined were fired in open fire structures, in an oxidizing atmosphere and at relatively low temperatures.

    “However, the microstructural and macrostructural evidences suggest all the ceramic objects here examined were fired in an open fire structures, in an oxidizing atmosphere and at relatively low temperatures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The two groups of figurines, corresponding to the two archaeological sites, were made with two types of raw material, as indicated by their chemical, mineralogical and microstructural differences.

    “It is proposed that the two groups of figurines, corresponding to the two archaeological sites, were made with two types of raw material, as indicated by their chemical, mineralogical and microstructural differences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The two groups of figurines correspond to the two archaeological sites and represent distinct production contexts.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The difference in inclusion size is an indicator of a probable selection of material used as temper for the figurines made in Inguapí, namely fine quartz rich sands, a choice not made at La Cocotera.

    “The difference in size is an indicator of a probable selection of material that was used as temper for the figurines made in Inguapí, namely fine quartz rich sands a choice not made at La Cocotera.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These differences are reflective of the origins and initial processing of the raw material and thus reflect technological choices related to the availability of raw materials and the recipes followed by the potters.

    “These differences are reflective of the origins and initial processing of the raw material and thus reflect technological choices related to the availability of raw materials and the recipes followed by the potters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Under oxidizing conditions, chlorite begins its thermal transformation by decomposition at 500°C, while reflection [1] disappears at 650°C.

    “These works reported that under oxidizing conditions, chlorite begins its thermal transformation by decomposition at 500°C, while reflection [1] disappears at 650°C.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [54] L Maritan, 2006, Influence of firing conditions on ceramic products: Experimental study on clay rich in organic matter, Applied Clay Science source
    • cites [55] M Maggetti, 2011, Temperature evolution inside a pot during experimental surface [bonfire] firing, Applied Clay Science source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The Tumaco tradition involved mass production of similar-looking ceramic figurines over a ~500 km stretch of geography and for over 700 years.

    “Considering the mass production of similar-looking ceramic figurines over a ~ 500 km stretch of geography and for over 700 years, it is appropriate to ask the extent to which technical choices show technological variability or homogeneity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In these figurines, the incision is clean, without a ridge or excess material, which indicates that this operation was performed on the clay in a semi-dry state.

    “In these figurines, the incision is clean, without a ridge or excess material, which indicates that this operation was performed on the clay in a semi-dry state.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The style evident in the figurines is a product of cultural action, but the materialization of those actions involved a series of activities and technical choices that reflect the potters' knowledge, ability, experience and environment.

    “The style evident in the figurines is a product of cultural action, but the materialization of those actions involved a series of activities and technical choices that reflect the potters’ knowledge, ability, experience and environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The analyzed samples from Inguapí were shaped manually by modelling, for this purpose homogeneous ceramic pastes were made with selected fine temper, kneading and mixing it properly.

    “The analyzed samples from Inguapí were shaped manually by modelling, for this purpose homogeneous ceramic pastes were made with selected fine temper, kneading and mixing it properly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    The maximum error calculated for XRF analysis was 5%.

    “The maximum error calculated was 5%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    Selected samples were similar in representation (all anthropomorphic figurines or sherds) and chronology (all belonged to the second phase, 350 BC-AD 350).

    “Second, that selected samples had similarities in terms of representation, chronology, ecosystem and context: regarding representation, all are anthropomorphic figurines or sherds; chronologically, they all belonged to the second phase (350 BC–AD 350)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The color differences reveal a thermal gradient, the use of an oxidizing atmosphere, and an incomplete oxidation process of organic matter and iron.

    “These color differences reveal a thermal gradient, the use of an oxidizing atmosphere, and an incomplete oxidation process of organic matter and iron.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The differences were detected in each and every one of the manufacturing stages, thus representing two different manufacturing pathways or chaînes opératoires within the broader Tumaco ceramic figurine tradition.

    “The differences were detected in each and every one of the manufacturing stages, as summarized in Fig 14, thus representing two different manufacturing pathways or chaînes opératoires within the broader Tumaco ceramic figurine tradition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Samples IN04 and IN05 did not exceed 800°C.

    “From this we derive that our samples did not exceed 800°C.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Iconography cannot be considered arbitrary, but rather the product of culturally determined requirements; as such it was an active means of communication, used to transmit ideological messages to a large number of people across extensive geographic areas.

    “Iconography cannot be considered arbitrary, but rather the product of a culturally determined requirements; as such they were an active means of a communication, used to transmit ideological messages to a large number of people across extensive geographic areas [19, 36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [19] Á Ramírez, 2006, El concepto de estilo en Arqueología: Análisis estilístico de figurinas antropomorfas Tumaco-La Tolita, un estudio de caso. Museo Arqueológico Casa del Marqués de San Jorge., Inversa
    • cites [36] E DeMarrais, 1996, Ideology, Materialization, and Power Strategies, Current Anthropology source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The consistent differences in the manufacturing process of these ceramic figurines during the most technologically complex phase of the Tumaco tradition are indicative of technological choices by the manufacturers, and the development of local ceramic traditions.

    “The consistent differences in the manufacturing process of these ceramic figurines during the most technologically complex phase of the Tumaco tradition are indicative of technological choices by the manufacturers, and the development of local ceramic traditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Possibly, there were also two strategies types of raw material selection, based on the differences in the percentage of fine material found, and in the preparation of the ceramic paste, as suggested by the presence of clay pellets in only one of the groups.

    “Possibly, there were also two strategies types of raw material selection, based on the differences in the percentage of fine material found, and in the preparation of the ceramic paste, as suggested by the presence of clay pellets in only one of the groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The evidence suggests that the figurines are complex and organized symbolic representations, showing some consistency in their morphological features.

    “Despite these limitations, the evidence suggest that the figurines are complex and organized symbolic representations, which show some consistency in their morphological features [9, 21, 22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] MF Ugalde, 2009
    • cites [21] K Stothert, 2003
    • cites [22] MaF Ugalde, 2019, Las alfareras rebeldes: una mirada desde la arqueología ecuatoriana a las relaciones de género, la opresión femenina y el patriarcado, Antipoda Revista de Antropología y Arqueología source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The selected fragments were materials collected by two research projects, contextualized geographically in the Tumaco tradition, allowing comparison of products, manufacture stages and technological choices.

    “First, the selected fragments were materials collected by two research projects, duly contextualized in the geographical of the Tumaco tradition, hence allowing a comparison of products, manufacture stages and thus technological choices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In both ceramic and metal materials, a particular style is recognized as a hallmark of the Tumaco-La Tolita tradition that combined sociocultural, symbolic, political, religious, environmental and economic factors with successful technological processes, and involved technical decisions that are culturally embedded.

    “In both materials, whether metal or ceramic, a particular”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [31] B Sillar, 2000, The Challenge of technological choices for material science aproaches in archaeology, Archaeometry source
    • cites [32] H Lechtman, 1977
    • cites [33] H Lechtman, 1984, Andean Value Systems and the Development of Prehistoric Metallurgy, Technology and Culture source
48 of 48
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Traditional studies of archaeological ceramics in Colombia have been largely based on visual and stylistic analyses.

    “Traditional studies of archaeological ceramics in Colombia have been largely based on visual and stylistic analyses.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The technological perspective on archaeological ceramics of the Tumaco tradition under study is non-existent.

    “The limited information available on archaeological ceramics in Colombia, particularly from the technological perspective (non-existent for the archaeological tradition under study), limits the analysis and comparison with other technologies, regions and other traditions, despite the fact that ceramics constitute the largest material record present in the archeology of Colombia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The analyzed fragments are representative of the original ceramic figurines and their manufacturing processes.

    “Our results identified clear and consistent differences in the manufacturing processes leading to the same type of representation (ceramic figurines), which indicate distinct technological choices at each of the two sites analysed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The raw materials used to make the figurines were locally available or procured at or near the sites where the figurines were recovered.

    “It is likely that these figurines were produced at workshops at, or near, the sites where they are recovered, adapting to local raw materials, customs and knowledge.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Shared style among the figurines reflects a shared ideology.

    “Despite sharing a style that reflects a shared ideology, technological choices reflective of a standardized industry are not observed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The detected mineral phases and microstructures in the fragments reflect original manufacturing conditions and not post-depositional alteration.

    “Overall, it can be concluded that the detected elemental and mineralogical differences indicate the use of two different types of raw material sources for the elaboration of the same representation of ceramic objects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The two groups of figurines correspond to the two archaeological sites and represent distinct production contexts.

    “It is proposed that the two groups of figurines, corresponding to the two archaeological sites, were made with two types of raw material, as indicated by their chemical, mineralogical and microstructural differences.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Iron oxide ranges do not match the XRF results

    Major

    Table 5 gives Fe2O3 values of 13.6-23.5% for La Cocotera and 8.1-13.7% for Inguapí, not the stated 21-28% and 13-17%. The discrepancy affects the reported magnitude of the difference between sites.

  • Sodium oxide trend is reversed

    Minor

    The text says La Cocotera has higher Na2O, but Table 5 reports no detected Na2O in any La Cocotera sample and detectable amounts in four Inguapí samples.

  • Stated Inguapí fine-inclusion size range excludes tabulated sizes

    Minor

    The stated 20-140 μm range does not cover the fine-fraction ranges in Table 6 for several Inguapí samples; T01 alone extends to 210 μm.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. G Reichel-Dolmatoff, 1997, Arqueología de Colombia: un texto introductorio
  2. F Valdez, 1987, Proyecto arqueológico "La Tolita" 1983–1986
  3. D Patiño, 2003, Tumaco prehispánico: asentamiento, subsistencia e intercambio en la Costa Pacífica de Colombia
  4. MF Ugalde, 2011, La imagen como medio de comunicación en el Desarrollo Regional. Interpretación de un motivo de la iconografía Tolita, Revista Nacional de Cultura Letras, artes y ciencias del Ecuador, III, 565
  5. MF Ugalde, 2009, Iconografía de la cultura Tolita: lecturas del discurso ideológico en las representaciones figurativas del Desarrollo Regional
  6. H Salgado, 1995, Alfarería Prehispánica Temprana [I Milenio A.C.] entre la bahía de Buenventura y el bajo Río San Juan Pacífico Colombiano, Boletín de Arqueología de la Fundación de Investigaciones Arqueológicas Nacionales
  7. J Cubillos, 1955, Tumaco: Notas arqueológicas
  8. H Salgado, 1993, Metalurgia Prehispánica y colonial-Republicana en el Pacífico Colombiano, Revista Colombiana de Antropología, XXX, 61
  9. H Salgado, 1995, Perspectivas regionales en la arqueología del suroccidente de Colombia y norte del Ecuador, 130
  10. E Ferdon, 1940, Reconnaissance in Esmeraldas [primera parte], El Palacio. XLVII [12], 257
  11. Á Ramírez, 2006, El concepto de estilo en Arqueología: Análisis estilístico de figurinas antropomorfas Tumaco-La Tolita, un estudio de caso. Museo Arqueológico Casa del Marqués de San Jorge., Inversa, 2, 62
  12. E Sánchez, 1981, Las "figurillas" de Esmeraldas: tipología y función
  13. I Bellier, 1991, El temblor y la luna: Ensayo sobre las relaciones entre las mujeres y los hombres Mai Huna
  14. J Errázuriz, 1980, Tumaco-La Tolita. Una cultura precolombina desconocida
  15. Y Sabolo, 1986, Tumaco 1000 ans d’art precolmbien
  16. T Cummins, 1994, Tecnología y organización de la prodcción de cerámica prehispánica en los Andes, 157
  17. G Reichel-Dolmatoff, 1961, Anthropomorphic Figurines from Colombia, Their Magic and Art. Essays in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology, 229
  18. S Allen, 1998, The structure of materials
  19. R German, 2005, Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials Processing
  20. E Galán, 2006, Materias primas para la industria cerámica
  21. C Guillem, 1988, Materias primas cerámicas. Yacimientos de Arcillas y Caolines, Boletín de la Sociedad Españolad de la Cerámica y el Vidrio, 27, 201
  22. O Rye, 1981, Pottery Technology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bustamante, N. A., Escobar, J. A., & Martinón-Torres, M.
Affiliations
Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
Venue
PLOS One
Published
2021-05-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
e0250230
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158191813
Cited by
3
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • University de los Andes de Colombia
  • Institute for Archaeo-Metallurgical Studies
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
ceramic figurines, reverse engineering, ceramic production, raw material provenance, firing temperature, ceramic microstructure, pre-Columbian pottery, cultural affiliation
MeSH terms
Archaeology, Ceramics, Colombia, Engineering, Humans, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review